WaxProlix

100 ms·

1. 1111.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   But maybe a reason for different action, no?
2. 1112.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   Yeah, that's entirely possible.
3. 1113.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   What it's testing for: 1. Passive alternation 2. It-clefting (simply `clefting` in some circles) 3. Another it-cleft? 4. It-cleft + possible scope ambiguity 5. Quantifier scope ambiguity (do you get quant raising, basically) 6. More cl
4. 1114.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   It'd be morally presumptuous!
5. 1115.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   People are pointing out that his signal-noise ratio is bad, but that's why there's a vote system in place. It seems like the n-word argument might be stronger than the 'poor content of posts' argument to me.
6. 1116.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   Same boat - there's a lot of granularity in the poll options but maybe not in the right way...
7. 1117.▲
   by WaxProlix 12y ago

   What work specifically are you referencing?
8. 1118.▲
   by WaxProlix 13y ago

   You could try SugarSync? It's fairly flexible and, if you're the type of person who can stomach it, works flawlessly under wine. There are solid native mobile apps and a good web interface, too.