WA

36 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   Ionic gives you a solid base for mobile and the web with a slight bias towards mobile. It's all web components, no native renderers, but quite polished, because it's been around for a while. Imho, you can get quite far with it.
2. 542.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   And yet, the author of the article teaches board games by not telling a story, but by explaining the winning condition. Imho, storytelling in a business/teaching/problem-solving context is overrated.
3. 543.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   What are you talking about? The first comment is literally a real sincere rebuttal: "performance doesn’t matter in 99.9% of apps".
4. 544.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   I enjoyed your way of storytelling, thanks for that.
5. 545.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   We have a chancellor who has acute Alzheimer symptoms when it comes to CumEx. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CumEx-Files
6. 546.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   Ionic components are web components with bindings for React, Vue and more. The advantage is that you can use Ionic in vanilla JS as well.
7. 547.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   I’m using Ionic heavily and judge it through this lens. - The components for iOS look nice, but some things are off: Sheet modal is weird. Animation of modals or side panels feel too slow. - There are no animations when navigating forward o
8. 548.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   Finally, the distortion filters in macOS PhotoBooth have a purpose.
9. 549.▲
   by WA 4y ago

   https://twitter.com/jakobgreenfeld/status/146676179509228750...
10. 550.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I joined LinkedIn two weeks ago for the first time and have never used it before. It feels very much like Facebook to me with a touch of business-LARPing.
11. 551.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I found it funny. It’s a tongue in cheek opener and imho, you guys take it way too literal. I can relate to the feeling that people in the past (at least the vast majority) were kinda stupid, because they were uneducated in many things. Of
12. 552.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Author is actually German lol.
13. 553.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Is a copyright notice required at all? Isn’t it the default anyways and only if you do something like Creative Commons, you need to explicitly state that you give permission for using your work?
14. 554.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    They replaced their bill for a somewhat productive workforce with a bigger, completely unproductive interest bill. So no, Twitter didn’t become less unprofitable.
15. 555.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    On first sight, the design looks nice. On second sight, it’s a slow SPA, showing placeholders for way too long. The usability around navigation has the typical buggy SPA feeling: Go here https://topcat.sora.city/found Tap a
16. 556.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I think there are plenty of living references to come to this conclusion. Jealousy naturally leads to competition. Most animals form hierarchical groups. Little children are competitive (take away stuff from others, look only for own needs
17. 557.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    https://archive.ph/0Nz3f
18. 558.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Isn’t the rule "Closer elements should be lighter" a contradiction with "Keep container colours within brightness limits"? Should a background be darker than the containers it holds? Or should containers be designed as i
19. 559.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    That is geared towards coming up with new rules I presume. Think about it: creating software is creating new rules. You gotta start somewhere and refine the system. But if you learn an existing rule system, you need to follow it first, then
20. 560.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I get the rage and I agree. I prefer it as well. But three points to consider: 1. In Twitter, just create lists instead of following. Strict reverse chronological order with no ads. Or use Mastodon, which has this by default. 2. Most users
21. 561.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Twitter works, because I read information that is NOT distilled by "big media outlets". I wanna hear the voices of indie devs, doctors, researchers etc. I don't need a fancy RSS reader with a sorting algorithm. Unless they ma
22. 562.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I know zero articles that went viral with varied and complicated prose. Care to share an example or two?
23. 563.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    There are too many dogs. In some countries, dog owners don’t give a shit and let their dogs poop everywhere (France for example). Many dog owners can’t handle their dogs. Dogs are scary for some people, especially children. Most dog owners
24. 564.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Descriptions like these makes me wonder how we ever made a single computer game with millions of polygons that are in view or not and must be rendered accordingly.
25. 565.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I liked Fallout Tactics a lot.
26. 566.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    I check for them too. It’s a credibility signal if a proper ToS, privacy statement and imprint exist. If they don’t exist, it appears as if the creators have something to hide. The regulatory requirements to build software are extremely low
27. 567.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Yes and no. Famous art is about context, circumstances and marketing. Strip a famous piece of art of its context and it doesn’t have meaning. If you find someone who can put an AI generated piece of art in the right context, it could become
28. 568.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Simply not true. I witness enough threads with heated debates. I don’t even mean the occasional political stuff, but technical things as well. For example, native vs Electron apps. The content might be always kinda similar, but there are cl
29. 569.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    Because in some cases, adding a style prompt gives almost the original image: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/wby0ob/it_...
30. 570.▲
    by WA 4y ago

    And the childish profanity filter. God beware, someone wants to type "shit". We can’t suggest this word and maybe autocorrect it to something else.