Volundr

39 ms·

691.
by Volundr 4y ago
Sure, but I was responding to the commenter saying you really should pre-wash at home too.
692.
by Volundr 4y ago
At least for honeybees, in general they don't. Source: my own beehives.
693.
by Volundr 4y ago
My dishwasher manual specifically tells me not to pre-rinse.
694.
by Volundr 4y ago
See also: the 14th amendment
695.
by Volundr 4y ago
Software Engineer with 15+ years of experience. I've been working with Clojure since 2014 but am a polyglot programmer with experience in Clojure, Elixir, Typescript, Java, C#, .NET, Ruby and more. I've also worked heavily with de
696.
by Volundr 4y ago
I feel like there was plenty of impingement though.
697.
by Volundr 4y ago
> If vendor A says the feature takes 3 months, but vendor B does the feature in 3 weeks, then it it's pretty clear who the customer is going to want to go with. That is until three days after launch when the module vendor B wrote k
698.
by Volundr 4y ago
I would be very torn on how to respond to a survey that asked me if I agree with "All lives matter". On the face it's clearly a true statement, almost tautological, but it's commonly used with tons of subtext I disagree
699.
by Volundr 4y ago
I don't own a Tesla, but my understanding is that autopilot is basically marketing speak for what everyone else calls lane assist and smart cruise control, while FSD is when the car is supposed to be able to drive for you. In other wor
700.
by Volundr 4y ago
Until openssl has another vulnerability.
701.
by Volundr 4y ago
Hang in there. January was really disheartening for me. Like literally dead, no replies, in a market where I'm used to just waiting for the recruiters to hit me up and pick between them. In the second half of February things are pickin
702.
by Volundr 4y ago
> If you had to code it you're at least thinking about edge cases etc. If you didn't code it you REALLY need to be thinking about edge cases, etc. ChatGPT (or stack overflow for that matter) makes tons of mistakes, at least as
703.
by Volundr 4y ago
To be more specific I'd bet the majority of these are public defenders. I'd bet people who can afford their own attorneys are far more likely to have charges dropped or go to court than the average case.
704.
by Volundr 4y ago
Unless you are making your coffee out of an chemical soup instead of coffee beans it would be sufficient to run trials on the beans.
705.
by Volundr 4y ago
I hadn't heard of this before. Reading about it a bit it feels like the worst of both worlds. Doesn't this mean you need to know firehole to create your firehol config AND know iptables to inspect what's actually applied?
706.
by Volundr 4y ago
That's a good question actually. Given the complexity and power of iptables and nftables (which is the reason UFW, firewalld and the like exist) I'd guess probably not. Trying to determine if a rule on another chain (or really a c
707.
by Volundr 4y ago
UFW works by creating iptables rules. It intentionally does not expose the full functionality of iptables. The u is for "uncomplicated". The fact that you can add iptables chains that take precedence over the UFW managed chain is
708.
by Volundr 4y ago
UFW works fine with iptables. The issue occurs because docker adds an iptables chain that takes precedence over the UFW rules.
709.
by Volundr 4y ago
Ah yes of course "I'm going to cast aspersions on you and your intentions by calling you a mindless troll. Don't bother replying, I'm done discussing it." If you want to be done, be done. I didn't drag you back
710.
by Volundr 4y ago
> You suggested the comment What comment? (Requires context) > both insightful and on-topic? Both? (Requires context, which you may want to re-examine.) > while at the same time requiring context to interpret. How is this in confli
711.
by Volundr 4y ago
They didn't brag about anything. They said they didn't reply to an e-mail. If this sounds boastful to you, it's baggage you brought. Between the article and the comment, there's more than enough context to infer that the
712.
by Volundr 4y ago
I worked for a company for 3 years after half my team was laid off. In hindsight I clearly should've quit, but yeah the folks laid off and collecting that severance were definitely the lucky ones.
713.
by Volundr 4y ago
The point your missing is the email was never the point of the comment, it was the fact that Amazon's practices have turned them off from Amazon. The recruiter email was just building a context that many of us can relate to. You'v
714.
by Volundr 4y ago
I don't think it's a particularly apt analogy. For one thing, being swiped left on is completely passive on Anne Hathaway's part. She didn't send an e-mail asking you to swipe right. One is an active action toward a spec
715.
by Volundr 4y ago
The employer could choose not to employ anyone who lives more than X distance away. Many already do.
716.
by Volundr 4y ago
OP said they ignored Amazon's e-mails. This does not contain the assumption that they would have necessarily have be hired if they had replied. Only that they chose not to pursue the opportunity. You then took it upon yourself to add y
717.
by Volundr 4y ago
Again, if we are discussing Anne Hathaway's dating life the fact that you chose to swipe left instead of pursing it, and why, is indeed relevant to the discussion. Is not a discussion I'm interested in having, but I'm sure yo
718.
by Volundr 4y ago
Did Anne Hathaway invite you to apply for a date? If so the fact that you declined and the reason adds to a discussion. Not this discussion, but one about Anne Hathaway.
719.
by Volundr 4y ago
What's the point of going through the work of getting the offer only to turn it down? This person didn't ask for a badge, they simply stated the reason they never so much as pursued an offer.
720.
by Volundr 4y ago
I was wondering why you were down voted right up until the last sentence. Pretty much everything we associate with being sick is our own bodies, not the virus. Inflammation, fever, cough, runny nose, swollen lymph nodes, etc, it's all

More ›