Veuxdo

8 ms·

61.
by Veuxdo 2y ago
What is the "AI" part of this...?
62.
Generating AWS Diagrams with Resource Explorer and Ilograph(ilograph.com)
2 points by Veuxdo 2y ago|0 comments
63.
Generating AWS Diagrams with Resource Explorer and Ilograph(ilograph.com)
2 points by Veuxdo 2y ago|0 comments
64.
by Veuxdo 2y ago
Never change, torrentfreak, never change
65.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Twitter: "But why do you need anything longer, human...?"
66.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Probably a lot, but that's fine. Early, experimental projects are kind of the point, I think.
67.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Reverse it. The goals should point to what tickets to do.
68.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
I'm building Ilograph, which has what you're describing as a special case of a diagram with no relations. For example: https://app.ilograph.com/demo.ilograph.AWS%2520Distributed-L... Note that this is an app, not
69.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
I think the issue is that the sci-fi "setting" has to be materially different than the modern world, otherwise you get the "____ in space" effect. This isn't an issue with historical settings, like the wild West or
70.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
I find that more often than not, when I pick up a sci-fi novel, it turns out to just be a detective novel innn spaaaaace
71.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
It is for a diagram visualization language, but I wrote on why Ilograph added Contexts earlier this year: https://www.ilograph.com/blog/posts/why-ilograph-added-conte...
72.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
I think it will be long time before ChatGPT can make system diagrams of real systems. It can make a plausible diagram of a fake system, but that's basically worthless.
73.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Peak AI *hype*, hopefuly
74.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Who is Car?
75.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
It's the circle of life.
76.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
The problem is, having to describe a diagram using text defeats the purpose of the diagram. Must better is to use diagrams that render as SVG, so screen readers can read them. [0] [0] https://accessibility.princeton.edu/how&
77.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Doesn't look like screen readers can read the text on these.
78.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
But what is non-human (or, really, non-animal) intelligence? I posit that there is no such thing, by definition. Computers have long been better than humans at certain tasks. That isn't "intelligence", though. If an AI can&#x
79.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Then it's time to stop calling it "artificial intelligence".
80.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
> Unless we're expecting that LLMs (or AIs) have an intelligence that is functionally identical to humans Actually, yes, that's exactly what we should be expecting when being sold "artificial intelligence".
81.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
There's two valid, and opposing forces at play here: - Motivation is a precious resource. If you are more motivated to work in an Open Source software business, then this will prevent burnout. - You have to ask if you're playing t
82.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
But Gemini is offering opinions and analysis (and they're often pretty terrible, to boot). It seems they've wandered pretty far afield from their mission.
83.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
They're computing things they've precisely been programmed to compute. Number crunching, in the end, with extremely low error rates caused by hardware faults. LLM error rates are comparatively astronomical.
84.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Other than search, what would you consider Google's best software?
85.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
> This doesn't really seem like an AI problem It can be many problems, but I think it is certainly an AI problem. A big one. It really shows that asking a computer for something is fundamentaly a bad idea. Computers are for, well, c
86.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Consider the OP's headline. They didn't even describe what their project was. All they said, all they think they needed to say, was that it is Open Source. And on HN, it's actually true. Open Source projects get lots of kudos
87.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
Ask an expert.
88.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
I think there's an easy solution: don't ask computers things. That's not what they're for.
89.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
At this point it you are searching for the "best" anything on Google, that's on you.
90.
by Veuxdo 3y ago
> O’Reilly said if he did not get his account back it would be “personally, quite annoying but professionally quite depressing” as Twitter was his route into his current profession as a journalist and author. He used it as a “shop front”

More ›