VaedaStrike

20 ms·

181.
by VaedaStrike 16y ago
I don't think that the underlying inherent knowledge that accompanies the capacity to successfully transmit understanding can be set apart from a more complete understanding. For example if you can produce any number of outcomes in a single
182.
by VaedaStrike 16y ago
To put it concisely :) A demonstration of empathy that translates to real communication with the particular lay person you are engaging with regard to your domain of expertise shows mastery rather than mere proficiency.
183.
by VaedaStrike 16y ago
"then you've demonstrated that you've not merely mastered the domain but that you have a grasp on a more foundational framework that translates to virtually limitless perspectives" I should have phrased that "not merely grasped" instead of
184.
by VaedaStrike 16y ago
To be concise is more indicative of mastery rather than proficiency. You can understand something very well and be able to navigate your way through your own domain of expertise at whim. But if you can do that AND also communicate your doma
185.
by VaedaStrike 16y ago
One of the interesting dilemas with the whole idea of "invest in future care instead of kids" is the question of whom you'll be purchasing that care from? And at what price? If society collectively gets more 'rational' (as per the author's'
186.
by VaedaStrike 16y ago
The idea that rich kids are more liberated is wrong headed. It's'simply myopic. There's'not even an attempt to explore the inherent advantages of the "other." Insight a rich kid can never have being merely one of dozens that shot into my f