Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
V_Terranova_Jr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
Windows is definitely part of the problem, but I agree it's not the problem. Linux or MacOS are not better enough either.
62.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
My god, I cannot second this enough. We talk craptons about "innovation" and torrents of words on "cybersecurity" yet underpin daily life on recursive kludges on 1980s operating system and software technology. It's
63.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
The F1 analogy is easy to use against this line of argumentation. Today's F1 cars are way faster than their predecessors. They are also safer, more automated, and in large part faster because they are easier to drive. The racing is
64.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
Well, there does seem to be a special Silicon Valley version of this where people get incredibly wealthy from their software/web businesses and conclude all they need to do is get into <some other radically-different field> and t
65.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
> Everyone was way more confident about the future of Ada, and with better reasons. Is Ada really good support for your argument? Ada's heyday was well prior to the ubiquity of the Internet, had no focus on ergonomics, etc. Its in
66.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
> More are employed coding Ada than Rust. > More code Forth than Rust Not trying to be a dick, but do you have any evidence you can point to for these claims? I find them to be surprising and unlikely.
67.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
Even as a product of one of those schools, I think the comparison against CA might be going a bit far, but as long as we're talking perceptions/stereotypes... In Aerospace, within both U.S. government and industry, midwest enginee
68.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
There was historically a push along these lines (Ada as official DoD language for the software on the systems it buys). I don't have the whole story as to when and how this stopped being a requirement (1990s?), or if it was ever a true
69.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
- I don't think SeL4 is "defunct" even though CSIRO's decision on the Trustworthy Systems group was profoundly incompetent; here's a relatively recent post from Gernot Heiser: https://microkerneldude.org&
70.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
It's been ~a decade since I was knowledgeable in SpaceX software development details, but at least then, they were not the kind of shop that emphasized rigor and formality. Their culture is oriented toward rapid implementation & t
71.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
Yes, there's a high likelihood we could make improvements in the laws. No, that would not address the reasons why accountability in law does not yield accountability in practice. ncmncm is right. The Executive branch is not going to
72.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
Agree wholeheartedly. Within government, the tendency is to avoid the extremely uncomfortable discussions pushing back on questionable activities other government entities are engaged in, especially if those activities can be ascribed to s
73.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
The sweet spot for civil supersonics from an aircraft design standpoint is less than Mach 2. You can maintain good propulsion system performance without variable geometry inlets, boom strengths are lower, aeroheating loads are lower, fuel
74.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
5y ago
> This article contains no new information True. And also, the author is an operator, but not necessarily someone involved in the engineering or acquisition. Nonetheless (and I say this as someone who was severely soured by my involvemen
75.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
NASA does publish on much of its research. See, e.g.: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/ There are other forums in which they publish export-controlled information. They patent things for at least two reasons. One is monetization - s
76.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
Having been involved with a large U.S. Government aerospace project that ultimately failed (there are a lot of USG program failures, and a lot of them in aerospace) Mr. Jacobsen's statement that "FAA leadership seems to be denying
77.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
> "Hypersonic weapons move faster than anything currently being used, giving adversaries far less time to react, and they provide a much harder target to counteract with interceptors" This is true if you understand the context.
78.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
Advice: be patient, use the various techniques to get your cat acclimated that are listed on the site. Ultimately, how cats deal with being harnessed even after being acclimated is extremely individual personality-dependent. I've seen
79.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
From the article: > the claim that hypersonic weapons can reach their targets faster than existing ballistic missiles The majority who are seriously working in these fields do not advocate for such systems based on this class of claims.
80.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
> That's what I call making a statement. Most people would interpret "making a statement" to be a matter of signaling to others. I tried to make clear that people who buy these cars appreciate the benefits to themselves a
81.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
I can recommend the Kitty Holster: http://www.kittyholster.com/
82.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
> I totally missed that the segment of rich people with enough disposable income to buy an average electric car as a statement was big enough to be viable. So, well played Tesla I guess. This is pretty dismissive. I'm not sure how
83.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
People are not interchangeable parts. If you have high-output staff in a high cost-of-living area, the strategy that recognizes this does what it can to "keep the band together" and keep them doing good for the company, not just
84.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
While you are correct, Elon's point is about "the writing on the wall" and in that, he's on point. Other than the small (OK, small-ish, given Virgin Orbit) startups, most aerospace companies are leaving CA or not bother
85.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
Anyone that wants to order a reusable RS-25 can have Aerojet Rocketdyne configure and manufacture it that way. See also the AR-22 variant used on the ill-fated DARPA XSP program. The real issue with that engine isn't its reusability,
86.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
Yes. That's on the civil side. On the defense & space side, BDS is working hard to shut down the storied ex-McDonnell Douglas Huntington Beach, CA facility and move to FL, Huntsville AL, and other LCOL sites. It's now as if
87.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
What's going on at the FAA is going on elsewhere with regulators as well, it's just that this one happens to be in the press a lot. IOW, they will not be going to prison. Do what you can in your role as a world citizen to suppor
88.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
To answer this, you'd need to compute the costs of the up-front engineering associated with trying to re-certify as a new type, and also the costs of the modifications. Additionally, there's always negotiation in the certificatio
89.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
The actual written feedback provided by Mr. Ewbank is far more useful than Bloomberg's summary: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2020-0686-0163 While I'm not a 737 expert, I have evaluated flight softwar
90.
▲
by
V_Terranova_Jr
6y ago
This reflects a lack of understanding how the U.S. Government works. There's essentially zero chance your statement is correct. There will be changes made to the aircraft, changes to training regimen, multiple reviews, etc., but the
More ›