VWWHFSfQ

61 ms·

961.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
Looks like we're at the "personalized recommendations based on extensive user behavioral tracking" phase now. I think every aspiring social app gets here eventually and in my opinion it's ultimately what ruins the whole
962.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
I wouldn't assume anything
963.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
why not install it with homebrew?
964.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
I wasn't intending for you to change anything in your comment at all! It was very thoughtful and well-articulated and I really didn't have anything else to offer. I just always zoom in on the "love" keyword when talkin
965.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
> It's extremely sad how love is criminalised First of all, we need to stop characterizing it as some kind _emotional_ thing like "love". It is not an emotional thing. It's a real thing.
966.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
This reminds me of when I used to put a sentence or two through Google translate and then put it through Google translate again with a different language and then paste it on my Tumblr. It's not actually anything. It's just compu
967.
by VWWHFSfQ 4y ago
Is this similar at all to the old pyjs/pyjamas project? I had some fun playing with that but there was no way I would have ever actually made anything serious with it.
968.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
I don't think it's important to worry about competitors stealing anything
969.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Because this is basically just PR spam
970.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
This is premature optimization right
971.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
This is basically the entire raison d'être for GPLv3. It doesn't matter much if the source code is available, or if the specification is available, if you can't actually write code to use it.
972.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
That's going way too far.
973.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
The patent in question that was invalidated [0]: Wireless image distribution system and method Abstract A system and method for distributing at least one digital photographic image is presented, the system and method comprisi
974.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
a plaintiff would have to prove actual damage. otherwise what would their claim be
975.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
can't you put that in the ci pipeline
976.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
what is click bait about it
977.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Well that commenter's username is 'diarrhea' so...
978.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Is Caddy scriptable? I don't know much about it. But ever since I discovered nginx-lua-module and OpenResty it's been pretty much a game-changer for me. Curious if other popular webservers have done similar? Not really talking
979.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Sounds like a great time to do some housekeeping/tech debt/quality of life improvements in the codebase. Not sure if that counts as product updates
980.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
I fail to see the difference. apple authorized themselves to bypass firewall rules without the users input
981.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
isn't this what pyc's are? what's the difference?
982.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Seems like a lot of theater to me. If you really have that kind of risk profile then you're not running your exit on your own vps. That will singularly identify you and there's no plausible deniability. And you're leaking
983.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Seems like a valid complaint to me. Apple is giving themselves privileges to end-around potential competitors on their platforms. Although this is not new.
984.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
sounds like a lot of punishment just so you can use an iphone. maybe try a different device
985.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
> We need to find a better reason why this happens. I don't believe it's liberal social values which are not lived by. So we need to find a reason that you agree with. Not a better reason.
986.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
From my experience if you stay on the Google flagship/Pixel line then everything is great. Pretty much every other vender is garbage and will screw you and you'll have the experience you're talking about.
987.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
They already do this whenever one of the developers fat fingers their code and loses all their own holdings. The whole thing is kind of a scam.
988.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
Just testing it out with netcat, I can see the client is sending it as regular basic auth header: $ nc -l 127.0.0.1 8000 GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:8000 User-Agent: python-requests/2.22.0 Accept-Enco
989.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
I'm certainly not denying that. But to try to claim that the server doesn't know the real password is completely false. Whether they hash/salt the stored value is completely irrelevant to the point that you have to trust th
990.
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
If the plaintext password traverses the server's memory space then yes it "knows" the plaintext password. A nefarious server administrator can do whatever they want with those plaintext passwords.

More ›