VMG

7 ms·

61.
by VMG 1y ago
This is hilarious, I have almost exactly the same prompts. Why are the LLMs so afraid of breaking changes and propagating exceptions?
62.
by VMG 1y ago
There is a giant orb in the sky that emits UV and has for billions of years. I think the microbes are still trying to figure this one out.
63.
by VMG 1y ago
The problem here is that there might be a bug fix or even security fix that is not backported to old versions, and you suddenly have to update to a much newer version in a short time
64.
by VMG 1y ago
naive question: isn't fiber optic cables for communication a counter-example to your thesis?
65.
by VMG 1y ago
> It configured also non-existent drivers, and for some reason it enabled monkey test support (but not test support). If it doesn't have the underlying base data, it tends to hallucinates. (It's getting a bit difficult to tell
66.
by VMG 1y ago
crawlers can run JS, and also invest into running the Proof-Of-JS better than you can
67.
by VMG 1y ago
I just tried this > Me: why is madrid the capital of france? > ChatGPT: It's not. Madrid is the capital of Spain. The capital of France is Paris.
68.
by VMG 1y ago
14:00 is a Schelling point
69.
by VMG 1y ago
related: googles song detection alg detects my phone vibrating as the song "Montagem Dilatação Hipnótica"
70.
by VMG 1y ago
> 3. Data while processing is un-encrypted, as code need to 'see' the data read the article again
71.
by VMG 1y ago
Don't feel bad. I sold my coins and now I'm glad I don't have the headache of securing it now.
72.
by VMG 1y ago
Unfortunately she is not contributing much to the discourse either. She just wants it to shift to the topics she cares about.
73.
by VMG 1y ago
Because an error is not an email?
74.
by VMG 1y ago
no, they get a lot more
75.
by VMG 1y ago
Nirvana fallacy
76.
by VMG 1y ago
I found the summary valuable.
77.
by VMG 1y ago
you're wearing the "they live" glasses don't you
78.
by VMG 1y ago
They will be driving around more for marginal reasons, and they will be more likely driving a car with an internal combustion engine
79.
by VMG 1y ago
> Finally, society says, with a huge sigh of relief. I don’t have to write a letter to my granddaughter. I don’t have to write a three-line fetch call. one of these things is not like the other I agree with the author, I usually do not c
80.
by VMG 1y ago
The LLM thing actually works. Who cares if it's deterministic. Maybe the same people who come up with arcane schemas that nobody ever uses?
81.
by VMG 1y ago
Watch out for the BPA in the receipt paper
82.
by VMG 1y ago
But what if somebody implemented garbage collection?
83.
by VMG 1y ago
> So I really hope you don't pull in packages randomly. That sounds like a security risk. It absolutely is, but that is besides the point > Also, good packages tend have a team of people maintaining it. How is that the same exact
84.
by VMG 1y ago
>> They usually do not care about the implementation. > [citation needed] Everybody agrees that e.g. `make` and autotools is a pile of garbage. It doesn't matter, it works and people use it. > It's not random, there&#x
85.
by VMG 1y ago
This is not true. It may be bad practice, but consider that the median developer does not care at all about the internals of the dependencies that they are using. They care about the interface and about whether they work or not. They usuall
86.
by VMG 1y ago
Well "I'm just not using it right" is a perfectly reasonable thought for a new technology. Isn't this the default? When new powerful tools come along, they often fit awkwardly into existing processes.
87.
by VMG 1y ago
I get it and I see the same problems as the author. I'm working on a few toy projects and I am using LLM for 90% of it. The result is 10x faster than if I coded it "by hand", but the architecture is worse and somewhat alien.
88.
by VMG 1y ago
keep in mind that the author is a comedian
89.
by VMG 1y ago
this is equally scary and inevitable it will be WASM-containerized in the future, but still
90.
by VMG 1y ago
the audio quality of the popular streaming versions is pretty bad

More ›