UqWBcuFx6NV4r

4 ms·

61.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
Careful. If you acknowledge this provable fact you just invite hordes of specs-table-rotted gigahertz-chasers to post replies that completely miss the point.
62.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
okay, so let’s get this straight: even though there are seemingly quite a few people here that clearly understand what is being said. However, the fact that YOU specifically either genuinely do not understand this / have never come acr
63.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
girl, we get it, you can count. re-stating your point does not a conversation make.
64.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
See, you’re just saying what they’re saying, but with emotive, thought-terminating language. Again, it’s easier to complain. Have you been living under a rock for your entire life? Have never ever been involved in a decision being made abou
65.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
Take this vague, emotive, thought-terminating language to your journal or a pub rant or something. What does this even mean? Only one entity in this interaction has free will and it’s not the LLM. “Humanity reliant on another technology” is
66.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
What if one’s entire existence doesn’t revolve around the role they play in capitalist systems? Comments like this make it blindingly apparent that this is just a VC’s web forum.
67.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
I’m glad you started your long comment the way that you did, because It made it so easy to discount. I find AI-assisted development to be quite enjoyable. I’ve logged many, many years of full-time development prior to LLMs hitting the scene
68.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
You are too young to even remotely reliably assert cause. Things get less fun when you do them more often, and you’ll be facing the realities of ‘professional’ development, if you’ve even started doing that yet. Be careful to not falsely at
69.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
You are trying to save face. You didn’t answer the question. You don’t ‘speak for a tribe of Real Developers That Use Vim’ or whatever. You just aren’t qualified to answer but couldn’t help getting on your soapbox. I know a couple of vim us
70.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
It literally doesn’t answer the question. “I don’t qualify to answer” isn’t an answer. Don’t tell me to “read deeper”. We are all reading the same comment. You aren’t more intelligent than anyone else here.
71.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
This is patronising. We know what macros are. There’s benefit in general, adaptable tools, even if some tasks can be accomplished with something more rudimentary. That’s not the point. Hell, the software that you’re so proud of writing with
72.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3mo ago
It doesn’t “make no goddam sense”. it’s just not convenient for you. There are so many potential “valid” reasons. Licensing? Bad optics?
73.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Dude, what? You’re upset about mandatory helmet laws? What next? Are you going to complain about seatbelts? Being a libertarian is one thing, but acting like there is no good justification from those whom you oppose, is just… dishonest. Bi
74.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
It’s always “safe to ignore” a blog because there’s seldom actual negative consequences for doing so. If you want to use such a silly, absurd heuristic, feel free to pay the opportunity cost. Pointless nostalgia-driven web surfing at its fi
75.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Absolutely nothing you said refutes anything in the comment you’re replying to. You are just reiterating “I’m angry and this is stupid”. Go write in your journal or something. It’s impossible to engage with someone who isn’t engaging thems
76.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Hi. Last I checked, one of the Hacker News rules isn’t “only have serious discussions regarding technical assessments. Failure to comply hereby entitles random people to fly off the handle and get very defensive”.
77.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
OK, so they’re furries. I love animals. I’ve never once thought: “these humans in this picture should be replaced with anthropomorphised animals”. This is peak “I read it for the articles”.
78.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
The prevalence of calling software development “engineering” was 100% a con job by either self-important nerds or the companies pandering to them in tight job markets.
79.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Or they were making a joke[0]. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke (…just like that)
80.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Intellectually dishonest comment. Kim Dotcom got done for illegal distribution. It’s not about “illegally downloading”. You can pretend all you want that it’s the same thing as these AI companies, but it’s not. It certainly very well may b
81.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Have you been sleeping under a rock for 30+ years, don’t know what antitrust is, and still feel confident enough to shout about it in a comment? The law isn’t just “what you happen to intuitively think is right”, especially in a jurisdictio
82.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
If you were right, the karma system would largely take care of this. It really sounds like this is more of your personal view
83.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Very sad reading his penultimate blog post: https://om.co/2026/06/08/taking-a-few-days-off/
84.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Someone needs to even out Dvorak!
85.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Maybe it’s derived
86.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
One doesn’t “get out of the way” for competitors, one is beaten by them. You just don’t know how to scroll past something you don’t like instead of going to the comments to complain about it.
87.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
That…isn’t the same thing at all, because your recount is factually incorrect. I’m not even a Tailscale user and I know that this isn’t equivalent.
88.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
You do not know what unacceptable means. Everyone that uses or buys Windows “accepts” it. What you mean is that you don’t agree.
89.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
Needing to resort to pinch and zoom for everything is an indicator of bad accessibility. HN “supporting” pinch and zoom is more like… HN not being responsive and/or being good about dynamic text size.
90.
by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4mo ago
* HN reader apps have existed forever. * There is a public API. ^ The incentives for “getting angry” aren’t there, like they were for Reddit. Think critically.

More ›