Ukv

60 ms·

631.
by Ukv 2y ago
I don't mean to claim that Musk is some genius playing 4D chess - just that it seems like there's an internal push on various KPIs (often leading to some short-sighted decisions) and this change would fit in with encouraging inter
632.
by Ukv 2y ago
> After all his bullshit he does not get the benefit of the doubt about being rational I'm not claiming his placing of so much weight in certain figures is rational - just that it's consistent with how these kind of sites opera
633.
by Ukv 2y ago
> Yeah and we've all seen him boast about a bunch of stuff, you can't take it at face value. I don't take it as face value in terms of believing the site is becoming more popular. > I reject your assertion that Elon Mus
634.
by Ukv 2y ago
I've seen him boast plenty about various engagement stats, and seen the site make superficial changes to try to boost them. It seems probable to me that "find ways to increase these numbers" is a pressure he's putting on
635.
by Ukv 2y ago
I imagine Musk wants higher engagement metrics to brag about, and removing barriers to liking content is one way to achieve that - which applies to many people and not just Nazis.
636.
by Ukv 2y ago
Being afraid of getting punished for liking the wrong thing could also be, for instance, an LGBT person in a non-accepting environment. There are many reasons for privacy that aren't anything to do with hate speech. Though, I think hav
637.
by Ukv 2y ago
This recent story comes to mind: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/jon-stewar... > The US late-night satirist Jon Stewart has responded after Britain’s Labour Party blocked left-wing academ
638.
by Ukv 2y ago
The prime example of evil incarnate? Not, say, death camps and genocide? I think it's generally an interesting technology with a lot of uncontroversially beneficial applications - things like voice transcription, drug discovery/
639.
by Ukv 2y ago
Am I missing some context? Where is it "recounted with such enthusiasm"? Edit: These are both brand new accounts created within a minute of each other. Is this some strange act from one person/bot? Or, maybe both coming from
640.
by Ukv 2y ago
> That is the whole point of the illusion, that there are two filled circles that flash and your brain perceives it as 3 flashes Where is this from? I could be missing something, but everything I can see in the article and the abstract o
641.
by Ukv 2y ago
I'm not so certain. You can already run a GPT-4-quality model locally on a decent desktop, and GPT-3-quality models on low-powered chips - plus data centers will benefit from scale. A lot of third-party services are using paid APIs tha
642.
by Ukv 2y ago
The user's reddit profile: https://archive.is/G5GIW They have a couple of other tools hosted on HuggingFace, both having the malicious dependencies and both requiring entering API keys, namely: "SillyTavern Charac
643.
by Ukv 2y ago
I don't think the level of involvement and conspicuousness required for this attack makes it any easier to cause crashes (even from afar) than it already was with human drivers, like by messing with the vehicle's brakes while it&#
644.
by Ukv 2y ago
> The boffins suggest that the attack could be carried out with drones, which serve to "hide" a secondary vehicle from the victim AV by projecting or carrying the adversarial object. It's an interesting topic to explore, b
645.
by Ukv 2y ago
> The moment you accept the need to always check the source, there's no fucking point to this anymore. > If you have to check the source ... just provide the links like Google Search does. There's no point in a summary whose
646.
by Ukv 2y ago
For its energy usage claim, this article links to another article[0] which gives "about 500 metric tonnes of CO2" as the figure for the training of "ChatGPT-3". Unless I'm making a mistake, that's about 6% of T
647.
by Ukv 2y ago
> This is just a lie [...] it's still a probability non-negligibly above zero. This kind of pretending you can "fix" the hallucination problem [...] I don't think "generally don't hallucinate" and &quot
648.
by Ukv 2y ago
To my understanding it's common to use evaporative cooling or discharge into a natural body of water, which would require full treatment again. Though ultimately if a data center is carbon negative and water positive (which to be clear
649.
by Ukv 2y ago
> Alan Turing himself didn't propose "the Turing Test" as an actually meaningful test It was the wording "can machines think" that Turing considered ambiguous due to varying opinions on how to define "think&
650.
by Ukv 2y ago
> Singing -> ever heard of vocaloids? They’ve existed for at least a decade or two That it was technically already possible does not mean there isn't benefit from improved quality. In fact, Vocaloid itself has been improving and
651.
by Ukv 2y ago
I don't think the solution to excessive sentencing is more excessive sentencing. The individual doctors/nurses presumably had no malicious intent, and it was commonly accepted knowledge within their practice at the time. But, ther
652.
by Ukv 2y ago
> I don't know why you started focusing on "unconscious bias" That's what I've been taking issue to from the beginning of this chain[0]. In all but one comment since then I've explicitly specified "[un|
653.
by Ukv 2y ago
This does make use of multiple microphones and timing between sound waves arriving. To my understanding, the machine learning part allows it to work even as the speaker/wearer move relative to each other, such as if you turn your head.
654.
by Ukv 2y ago
I'm similar - I feel as though how quiet or high-pitched someone can physically hear must be a largely separate matter from how well their brain can separate out and process speech. If all the processing is on-board, I don't think
655.
by Ukv 2y ago
Wouldn't say it's complicated, but it is a specific point. Attacking claims like "they were all shocked, shocked! that people made this connection after they released it" is meaningless when that is not a claim I'm
656.
by Ukv 2y ago
My claim is not that they hadn't heard of the movie her, but that while setting up auditions, the chain of thought that would lead them to predict a group would take issue in this very particular way (marcus_holmes's assertion tha
657.
by Ukv 2y ago
> "if we use a voice that sounds anything like the voice in the famous smash hit movie that mainstreamed the idea of the kind of product we're making [...] I think it's deceptively easy to overestimate how likely it is for
658.
by Ukv 2y ago
I know and agree. The article's claim is that the anonymous voice actress's natural voice sounds identical to the AI-generated Sky voice. That is, VA = AI, not AI = SJ or VA = SJ. Which corroborates with the claim that OpenAI was
659.
by Ukv 2y ago
First two claims are "according to interviews with multiple people involved in the process", direct quotes from the casting call flier, and "documents shared by OpenAI in response to questions from The Washington Post".
660.
by Ukv 2y ago
Just to make sure: have you correctly understood the article's claim? It's saying that the anonymous voice actress's natural voice sounds identical to the AI-generated Sky voice (which implies it has not been altered by OpenA

More ›