Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Uhhrrr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
To me this piece just looks like someone who hates wealth and willfully misunderstands metaphors.
62.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
Do we actually know that this is only targeting Americans? If I were a state actor who put this thing together , I would use it on everybody. with one exception; someone in the US might not think about doing it in other countries
63.
▲
Cheese Wars: Rise of the Vibe Coder
(steve-yegge.medium.com)
2 points
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
|
0 comments
64.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
I worked in EDA while the transition happened. We and our customers had been big buyers of Sun and/or HP workstations. The switch happened several years after Linux was released. When x86 performance started to look competitive, there
65.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
In your comment above, you said that the less-hyperbolic version is killing all "bad" men, including the president. If one is trying to get all non-"bad" men on board with this, why would you use an alienating slogan lik
66.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
I confess, I'm not very bright and am having trouble decoding the subtleties of "Kill All Men!" as you have done. Could you explain how you got from "All" to "just the bad ones"? Would you interpret "
67.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
Media has almost always been a money sink, including now.
68.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
"The audience will always be held when a status is being modified." Whoa. This is a very neat trick.
69.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
Yes, he was starting to talk about it at the end of the interview.
70.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
Hey, they cut him off before he could tell what they did after calculating a Hamiltonian as a Go constant!
71.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
11mo ago
I have a great user experience on it. Here's what I do: I follow people who are consistently interesting and don't post too much. Then I only use "Following". "For You" is an algorithmic attention vortex for th
72.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
1y ago
To be fair, among the first questions interested people would ask about something like this are, "what can we use it for?" and "will it scale?"
73.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
1y ago
I found that book before ever reading any Kerouac, and it indeed put me off. Of possible interest to the "ramen profitable" set, there's a part in the book where she had no money and had heard you could live on just cabbage a
74.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
1y ago
"must have"
75.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
1y ago
The article doesn't mention what percentage had alcohol, with and without THC. Why not?
76.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
1y ago
From Vinge's "Rainbow's End": > In fact this business was the ultimate in deconstruction: First one and then the other would pull books off the racks and toss them into the shredder's maw. The maintenance labels
77.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
1y ago
In what specific way do you disagree with them?
78.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
And that's just the user experience! For developers: - multiple heap allocators - have to install runtimes, even for C - all useful permissions are off by default - entire GUI is permeated by "Not Invented Here" mistakes - ms
79.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
per se
80.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
"for you" means you want the algorithm to decide for you. Use "Following" instead.
81.
▲
The Death of the Stubborn Developer
(steve-yegge.medium.com)
13 points
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
|
2 comments
82.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
I used it for like two weeks.
83.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
I tried TikTok and never saw much political content at all. The algorithm gave me little dances and bad cooking. I finally got it to ditch the bad cooking and show me some interesting pseudo 70s horror AI videos. But then things kept repeat
84.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
+1 for Lens - It can translate manga in near-real time.
85.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
The wazzap was mocking a trend of dudes greeting each other with "whassup" by elongating it ridiculously. Some of the appeal came from the execution and some from hitting just the right point in the zeitgeist.
86.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
If you don't follow him and use "Following" instead of "For You", you will basically never see him. "Following" is invariably better anyway, because then you're seeing the things you want to instead o
87.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
I think it's surprising because the piece is new and it links to the Slate and crmvet articles.
88.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
It's interesting that the Slate and crmvet pieces have updates about the search for authenticity, but this piece published today doesn't mention it.
89.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
The couple I've been to were pretty rich; I don't think you'd actually want to go there every day. Example: a dish at Chez Panisse which had an inordinate amount of duck fat. Delicious, but...
90.
▲
by
Uhhrrr
2y ago
In 2008, I learned enough Java from HFJ to pass an interview and do well in the subsequent job. I generally like their approach.
More ›