Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Tryk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
What makes you say that?
32.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
Elisabeth Klett is phenonmenal, way beyond any professional recording I've purchased. https://librivox.us/search.jsp?search=reader%3A%22Elizabeth+...
33.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
The problem is that many students come to university unequipped with the discipline it takes to actually study. Teaching students how to effectively learn is a side-effect of university education.
34.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
Yes, in one scenario when you lose the money you move on. In the other, governments bail you out and you keep gambling.
35.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
Source?
36.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
That's cool. So can you elaborate on how your long-term profitability is projected? Of course there would not be too much point in contributing to a project that gets aggressively monetized in the near future.
37.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
Well they've been getting away with it for years seemingly without any real consequences. Why should we assume corporations behave morally when there are no sanctions?
38.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
It's like a programming language inside a programming language.
39.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_alphabet
40.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
This is explored in the Vulnerable world Hypthesis-argument by Nick Bostrom [1][2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulnerable_world_hypothesis [2] https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1758-5899.12718
41.
▲
by
Tryk
1y ago
Tell me 5 cars brands on the top of your head.
42.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
How do you define the "correct" answer?
43.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
Yes... And why is theft bad?
44.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
old.reddit.com still uses pagination
45.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
I would disagree with some of your reasoning. Workers created the wealth, and by workers I mean everyone from delivery people, software developers, managers etc. However, due to political decisions most if not all of that wealth is shared a
46.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
Most people require work to pay for food and housing. Not everyone is able to find a wealth of options for selling their labour. But as I said, I think the argument requires some basic empathy/solidarity to follow.
47.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
I guess it would presuppose some solidarity with the workers at Amazon At a glance: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/12/study-amazon-workers-serious... https://www.latimes.com/business/story
48.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
No indeed, it is not a zero-sum game, billionaires like Musk and Bezos have more money than Scrooge McDuck [0], the cartoon version of Greed. While their share of the global wealth is increasing by each year "The richest 1 percent grab
49.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
>There is much to learn from considering this reality Like what?
50.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
An interpretation that made sense is "cybernetics" as the ancient Greek word for the one who steers the ship.
51.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
The notion of a proof and verification of a real-life software are almost completely disjoint. Of course, if you are interesting in proving statement about abstractly defined constructs: infinity is no issue as your domain is uniform. In re
52.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
With an infinite domain (e.g.numbers) randomised testing is necessary, no?
53.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
Why were you born? Because people were trying to save costs?
54.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
You are uninmaginative.
55.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
It is not inevitable, almost nothing is... This just bothers me because so many people in tech talk about things as being "inevitable" when it's just a lazy resignation to the current zeitgeist. There are a plethora of other
56.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
There is agreement that it should not be illegal, for one.
57.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
Yes, so if we assume that cost saving is the only metric that is meaningful and that there should be no legislation or norms saying otherwise, then indeed it follows as a consequence. But that does not make it "inevitable".
58.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
It's only inevitable if people agree that this is the case.
59.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
I don't follow your reasoning, 3 years is a significant time. Are you saying that you need to be above 70 to become a "bond villain", haven't seen that movie. But in any case he was working for United since 2004, accordi
60.
▲
by
Tryk
2y ago
With this line of reasoning, the french revolution was about the stipend of the King. Have you ever seen The Dark Knight? There's this quote about sending a message.
More ›