Trombone12

13 ms·

91.
by Trombone12 7y ago
An obvious difference is that it's the semen that makes things unclean, while for menstruation it's the woman herself that is the unclean agent. For semen, there is a clear distinction that it is anything it touches becomes di
92.
by Trombone12 7y ago
No, "array" would be unambiguous. Asking for a list of different elm species a valid interpretation.
93.
by Trombone12 7y ago
Another poster pointed out that he will obviously pay it back by investing in bitcoin!
94.
by Trombone12 7y ago
Bit weird to not use spell check, but when writing a mail to a crank... eh, whatever. I'm honestly more surprised the vice editor left out a [sic] after "fdar", did they really miss that one?
95.
by Trombone12 7y ago
And how do you tell it's not one of those lights we've had in the sky for ages if you're driving in your car?
96.
by Trombone12 7y ago
He said "drone", and surely it wasn't simply a point light that Myers observed, but rather a perceptibly extended object at least? So did this credible Myers also demonstrated the about 6 cm diameter binoculars needed to reso
97.
by Trombone12 7y ago
ITT: > Too poor to make stove out of bricks > Goes spend full day per week to go an check on their bitcoin transactions Uh, are you sure you have a grounded understanding of what rural poverty means?
98.
by Trombone12 7y ago
Yeah, all that talk about free internet for all the poor and oppressed sounds pretty suspicious set beside the claims that starlink is supposed to make money too. How will a rural Guatemalan farmer that cooks on a three stones fire provide
99.
by Trombone12 7y ago
> Too bad we have to give up the night sky for it, though. Oh, I wasn't aware we were getting any choice in the matter? Isn't this SpaceX just putting whatever they want up there?
100.
by Trombone12 7y ago
If there is any connection, it will not be as simple as "darkness == demoscene". If there is any connection it will be that winters and bright summers get you used to just staying inside with blinds down all year.
101.
by Trombone12 7y ago
Copyright is no less a concrete concept, and that can have single owners, so this is already a somewhat solved problem. Invoking rights helps nothing, ownership is already inherently about who has rights, so all you do is muddle the meaning
102.
by Trombone12 7y ago
To me the scope seems rather narrow, and the technical requirements about on par with a mailing list.
103.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Right, tell that to your semiconductor based computing device.
104.
by Trombone12 8y ago
At that level of detail you could just be chanting "god did it" over and over, it comes out to about the same explanatory power.
105.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Uh, no. Pretty textbook nuclear proliferation, the KSA doesn't have the required treaties with the IAEA to buy a nuclear power plant from responsible parties of the NPT. This doesn't matter to Bolton of course, because he simply h
106.
by Trombone12 8y ago
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia don't have the agreements with the IAEA required for a party to the non-proliferation treaty to sell them regulated technology as they currently don't have any nuclear facilities. But you know how Trump
107.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Who ever? It's the Trump administration, says so right at the top.
108.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Well, there is this entire science describing the universe and how it works you see, and that science makes certain prediction about things like how easy it is to kick something out of a star system and how likely a rock thrown in a random
109.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Uh, what? Plait makes the important point that the light curve is hard to explain without tumbling, and if the "sail" is tumbling the entire acceleration calculation presented in the paper is shit. Kind of a big deal.
110.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Big cpu means shit battery time, and thus a shit camera. And locking into a specific hardware configuration in a field that is basically all about making hardware developments seems kind of short sighted.
111.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Are you actually, and unironically, suggesting that cameras should be replaced by smartphones? I mean, edit on a camera? If that is a serious use case for you then you can make do with your smartphone, you don't actually need the accur
112.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Yeah, I was happily expecting an interesting radio station, and instead got a disappointing SPA about camera software :(
113.
by Trombone12 8y ago
So how are the click troughs on the amp stories doing in the land of the free?
114.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Were would that go? The author doesn't seem too keen on actually soldering on the inside of the devices, and they all give analogue out. Maybe you meant an amp?
115.
by Trombone12 8y ago
Well, they are derelict. When derelict house you become, look as well you will not, hm?
116.
by Trombone12 8y ago
There is not a single concrete facade among those pictures, so that seems a strange question to ask. In any case, the answer is of course that concrete cubicles can be made both poorly or with great skill.
117.
by Trombone12 8y ago
That sounds useful for making porn to sell, but what is the point of making your own sextape if you can't tell it's you on it? There is already loads of porn...
118.
by Trombone12 8y ago
For paper ballots you can't usually manipulate them ahead of time to record an fraudulent vote, and you need to sneak around with a big box of votes which is just logistically more challenging.
119.
by Trombone12 8y ago
A article about "alternative" black holes without the word LIGO in it? Yeah, I'm gonna have to stop you right there and ask you to sell that snek oil somewhere else.
120.
by Trombone12 8y ago
That makes no sense, black holes are like super much the opposite of a void. Further, repulsion is precisely the opposite of gravity.

More ›