Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
TrinaryWorksToo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Do you understand how poor some people are?
92.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
> and those smart enough to have invested in them. Correction: Wealthy enough to be able to invest in them.
93.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
I'm in favor of instituting demurrage currency, which has the feature of being unable to hide money from taxes.
94.
▲
Sacred Economics
(sacred-economics.com)
1 points
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
|
0 comments
95.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Could this technique also help with weight loss, as co2 is a byproduct of metabolizing fat.
96.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
I like reading about ESE (empircal/evidence-based software engineering) for precisely these reasons. For example, someone found that SOLID programming didn't offer much of a benefit to code readability. This is my favorite talk on
97.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Actually, the book agrees with you. There's very little evidence to support having a ridgid set of rules to follow when programming. There are a few high-level take-aways from the recurring patterns seen in the analysis; these include:
98.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
LBRY?
99.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Nota Bene: Simon Baron-Cohen's science around autism is often not replicated elsewhere. He makes some theories around this specious science, like the extreme male brain theory (despite there being many autistic women) and the systemizi
100.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Kills the bacteria and the patient too!
101.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
So we're basically back to ad-supported Opera then?
102.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBc7qBS1Ujo
103.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Self-publishing platforms, like lulu.com
104.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
If the ball only takes a color when it's observed (loosely), couldn't that timing be exploited to convey information?
105.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Greenwashing
106.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
There is no evidence beyond the authors opinion that these are valuable skills. I wish more people looked at empirical research into management for evaluating who to hire.
107.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Quantum Computing is so new, it's in the realm of op-code level abstraction, maybe even processor architecture.
108.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Well my question is: Is this the goal? Or do we want one person to own all of the means of production, and have everyone else get nothing?
109.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
They could repair themselves.
110.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
If everything is automated, there would be no repair jobs as robots would self-repair.
111.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Yeah, we don't need people to work. This will incentivize people to automate work where possible. The ideal world is everything is automated and EVERYONE benefits, vs what we have now: much is automated and the rich benefit while other
112.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
Have you read the book that promoted the word meritocracy? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_of_the_Meritocracy This critiques meritocracy. It also coins it.
113.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
You don't need a Costco membership to buy using instacart.
114.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
I'm gonna see!
115.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
I have autism, and this could be super helpful with my executive dysfunction. I'm gonna try it out!
116.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
I've been thinking about trying to build something like this! This looks so helpful!
117.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
This is basically Microsoft Access forms.
118.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
In fact, NASA used a sort of knitting as an early form of ROM! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_rope_memory
119.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
People will be exceptional regardless of if they go to school.
120.
▲
by
TrinaryWorksToo
6y ago
If we have fewer exceptional students, perhaps we would have exceptional people that would do exceptional stuff instead. It's not necessarily a bad tradeoff.
More ›