Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Traster
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
>The Org Chart Survivor - Your company made you 'AI Lead' on top of your actual job. You use it, it helps sometimes, and you've stopped trying to explain to leadership what it can and can't do. You run little experime
32.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
Interesting. But if Sam really believes that the US public should share in the benefits of AI surely the number should be 50% not 5%.
33.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
The hardware will become obsolete but we may end up with an oversupply of cheap power - overbuild on things like Nuclear and solar. That would be nice.
34.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
I think we're going to look back on this as one of the things that really exacerbates this bubble. It's one thing for these companies to have high expectations of their future compute needs and therefore overbuild. But what the Sp
35.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
Let me blow your mind. The reason laundry doesn't take much of your time is because we built a robot to do it for you and it already handles 99.99% of the job and it costs a couple hundred bucks and it's called a washing machine.
36.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
This is another industry that seems to me a lot like the AI glasses. It's that sweet spot of being extremely difficult to make work, whilst simultaneously offering almost nothing of value. It's actually striking that what they
37.
▲
by
Traster
3mo ago
It's being released on November 19th, you need a box so it can go on a shelf in walmart so your relative can buy it, wrap it up and put it under the christmas tree.
38.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
It's a good business. Maybe even a great business. But it's not going to justify a valuation like Space X. In the same way that Tesla has slowly become less competitive in automotive, I don't think it's sensible to assum
39.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
I'm still waiting for the real news to drop- in the next 6 months we're going to start hearing some big moves from Space X AI. Early this year they lost pretty much all their leadership, it's very clear they failed to keep up
40.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
The CEOs ideology matters due to the fact it impacts the product design. The reason people don't want to use Grok is because it's bad, and it's bad because the team behind grok have to spend cycles crowbarring in far right wh
41.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
To be honest I almost think the numbers are irrelevant. In 2024/25 there was a lot going on - will AI replace authors, film makers etc. Will it replace social media (anyone remember Sora?). A tonne of that stuff didn't work out. A
42.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
This seems smart. Apple, despite not really leading in AI themselves, are right on the hot path of where developers are going to yolo slop into the ecosystem. Make a tonne of sense to define a nice clean API that places like Anthropic can b
43.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
Look at what the EU have done with Apple intelligence. Knowing the EU it wouldn't be long before Anthropic are on the wrong end of some regulation to force open model weights or some such madness.
44.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
Because the question they're asking isn't "What is the best way to solve this problem" the question they're asking is "Where can I shove my AI into this product".
45.
▲
by
Traster
4mo ago
Why are there so many flagged comments in here? They all look fairly banal but yet still flagged.
46.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
It's already in the public domain (thanks to the OpenAI trial) that Grok distilled OpenAIs models. Listening to the data going into the models in the data centre would be very similar thing. There's some downsides (you're pas
47.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Seeing both OpenAI and SpaceX trying to yeet themselves into public markets as fast as possible I've got to wonder if the music is slowing. There's a neat rocket company with a satellite business in here somewhere, but it's m
48.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
I guarantee the reason that number is so high is so that SpaceX can offer to merge with Tesla and the end results will be Musk having over 50% control in the combined entity. He's been very clear that's what he's been attempt
49.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
I don't think this is right. Anthropic's growth in the last 6 months went hockey stick in quite an unexpected way (eclipsing OpenAI), so they've done what is sensible - they've increased their compute spend. I don'
50.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
The more I read about how big businesses operate the more I think it resembles the weather. There's no intelligence in there, it's just random fluctuations. FiveThirtyEight never made any sense at Disney and seems to have been pas
51.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Apparently neither do a big chunk of HN readers.
52.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
To be honest I'm more worried about the data centres spaceX is powering through gas turbines just sitting in a parking lot.
53.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Tesla self driving kind of works. In a very similar way to how it kind of worked back in 2016. It's better than it was in 2016, don't get me wrong. But even today they haven't solved the problem and Karpathy left in 2022. And
54.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Well Karpathy left in 2017, and all the sort of commercial stuff didn't happen till a while later - for example they set up the structure to take external money in 2019 and that's obviously the point at which they'd found the
55.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Karpathy is probably one of the biggest names in AI, I do wonder where he fits now. He's sort of bounced around Tesla back to OpenAI back to independent. He sort of left OpenAI before it really hit the inflection point, and he was at T
56.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
It's logic that is incompatible with about 60 years of affirmative action policies that the United States has carried out.
57.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Is this the right view? I would imagine Elon Musk has essentially infinite demand for lawyers. The choice for the lawyers is probably work on this absolutely dead case where all the facts are not just against them, but highly embarrassing f
58.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
Can we just bring some reality to this conversation. The non-profit still exists, it owns a significant chunk of a now almost trillion dollar company, and the for-profit wouldn't be profitable if it weren't for Billions of dolla
59.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
I think you're being too generous, one of the big take aways from the trial was that Musk's other AI effort - xAI is a total shit show, and that most of the experts here don't think Musk understands how to run an AI lab. Whic
60.
▲
by
Traster
5mo ago
The interested parties are the taxpayers, and in this case the legal mechanism for that was the California Attorney General approving OpenAI's restructuring. Here's the MOU: https://oag.ca.gov/system/files
More ›