Toutouxc

12 ms·

151.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
That's interesting, why don't farmers run some sort of common reserve pools of vehicles, as a form of insurance?
152.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
Huh? Aren't the tractors using a loophole to avoid emissions regulations? You can do a lot of things if you don't care about the spirit of the law and your negative externalities.
153.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
There are many different NMC battery chemistries, and they are still evolving. It's likely that whatever you think would be a problem (because NMC) wouldn't actually be a problem for you. But yes, the first two generations of the
154.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
I haven't used a chainsaw in a few years, but the last time I did, electric ones with a cord were great. I switched from a proper Stihl chainsaw to a budget electric one with a cord, and despite it being smaller and sort of flimsy, it
155.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
There’s nothing important in the last paragraph.
156.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
Because it’s long and I can’t put it down.
157.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
For me it's "The Hunt for the Death Valley Germans", which is often quite problematic.
158.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
Interesting idea but I don’t like this: > More pedestrians than ever use ANC headphones. > Car horns get through, but bike bells get blocked. Leading to a rise in cyclist / pedestrian collisions. Either you’re talking about using
159.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
I don’t see (nor do I care about) the code and how sculpted it is. I perceive the tool as buggy.
160.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
The idea is that Claude Code is surprisingly buggy and unrefined for something created by the very tool and processes that are supposed to be replacing us as we speak.
161.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
I drive an EV, I asked because the comment genuinely didn’t make sense to me.
162.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
That’s also my impression (experienced and competent driver). The other day I saw a video of someone testing Tesla FSD in Prague (where I live), the person was praising it for dealing with various situations quickly and with confidence, whi
163.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
> All but a couple were 350V, WY was the worst state (NY->WA), battery conditioning had charges ~200V for the first phase until charge levels became the dominant factor. Sorry but what? I can maybe understand “V” instead of “kW” (why?
164.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
So.. would you mind releasing all your code on GitHub?
165.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
That's the fun part: most of the stuff currently on the market is quite good. The quads, the gear — if a few people recommend it on Reddit, it's likely totally fine for a beginner and it will fly well. A few pointers: The guy we a
166.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
Statistically, knowing multiple people at Google is, IMO, a pretty good sign you're in a bubble. Unless you know a few thousand other software developers.
167.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
I'm literally looking at Claude in the other window telling me that the bug we're working on is a "Clear-cut case", telling me to remove a "raise if this is called on this object" guard from a method, because &
168.
by Toutouxc 6mo ago
How is that even remotely implausible?
169.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
What kind of skill does it require to let LLMs write 100% of your code? I'm genuinely asking, what's the hard part that a pre-LLM developer is fundamentally incapable of doing? Is it running the agents in a loop? Or along a state
170.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
> stuff that is levels above what I ever made How is that measured? Is his stuff maintainable? Is it fast? Are good architectural decisions baked in that won't prevent him from adding a critical new feature? I don't understand
171.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
I'm letting it write (type out) most (80-98%) of my code, but I see it as an idiot savant. If the idea is simple, I get 100 lines of solid Ruby. Good, saves me time. If the idea is complicated (e.g. a 400-LOC class that distills a cert
172.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
The thing is that the HOW of today becomes the context of someone else's tomorrow session, that person may not be as knowledgeable about that particular part of the codebase (and the domain), their LLM will base its own solution on tod
173.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
Technically that's true, but unless you literally write every single line of code, the LLM will find a way to smuggle in some weirdness. Usually it isn't that bad, but it definitely requires quite a lot of attention.
174.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
Wait, you guys don’t live on a continent?
175.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
> the batteries go bad in less than half the time you mentioned This.
176.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
Would be amazing if you could stop blatantly lying.
177.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
Nope. Pairing with Claude Code makes programming smoother for me and makes it easier and faster to check different solutions (i.e. "sketch out this approach and let's see how that works out"), but there are no lootbox moments
178.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
Works just fine for me in Prague, Czechia. The running costs of my EV are exactly the same as those of my previous car (a 1-liter econobox). And it’s a 200hp RWD.
179.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
I’m an apartment dwelling EV owner, so I’m well aware of that, but even here, where high density housing is pretty common, at least 50% people could theoretically charge at home with no or minimal adjustments. And on top of that, workplace
180.
by Toutouxc 7mo ago
It was Onshape for me, but the same idea. The concepts take just a few hours to "click" (the idea that you're stacking changes chronologically, which is different from e.g. layers in photo editing), but then you can suddenly

More ›