Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Tostino
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
46 ms
·
931.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
It does the second you want to join to the results of that subquery...this is an optimization that recognizes that the alias is never used and thus can be omitted. Nice QOL feature.
932.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
I really wish there was a way to handle transaction pooling without losing session pooling features. Essentially, a "please serialize everything (temp tables, SET GUC values, etc) from this session to disk and load it back when necessa
933.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Humans?
934.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
I didn't say, or intend to imply they had any invasion plans of the US. I was saying that they seem to be gearing up to invade Taiwan.
935.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Getting an API key has been just a waiting game here... Not been approved through work or personally yet after almost 3 months. I already have plugin access though, it's...alright. The web browsing leaves a ton to be desired.
936.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Just wondering what your thoughts are on China's self determination in deciding to invade or not? Why are you acting like the US is the one invading another nation?
937.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Rancher Desktop has been pretty seamless for me for local k8s development. Not too much different than a docker-compose.
938.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Are there any ways to train it to maintain attention on the original prompt no matter the distance from it, and selectively pay attention to its own output where relevant?
939.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
I get it, but it is just about infinitely configurable to your specific needs so it doesn't bother me too much what the default response is.
940.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Prompt it to be information dense in its response then.
941.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
I generally add to my initial prompts to GPT4 to: From now on, please use the fewest tokens possible in all replies to save tokens and provide brief and accurate answers.
942.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
I'm almost at 2 months of waiting at this point.
943.
▲
by
Tostino
3y ago
Heh, autocorrect messed up context for contacts. Sorry for that. I was talking about context for the problem I am working through. So it's not zero work to just "ask the AI" ang get an answer...you need to know essentially
944.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
I can use GPT 4 for to work through problems that I have not actually figured out previously by talking to co-workers who work in my industry. I need to feed it contacts for my industry explicitly within the prompt and ensure that it unders
945.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
Personally, the difference between GPT4 and 3.5 is, pretty immense for what I am using it for. I can use GPT 3.5 for things like summarization tasks (as long as the text isn't too complex), reformatting, and other transformation type t
946.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
The amount of valuable data generated from professionals using these services to work through their problems and find solutions to industry problems is immense. It essentially gives these companies the keys to automating many industries by
947.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
It's behind a waitlist.
948.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
"It's an overpowered autocomplete that was trained to have a conversation rather than completing your thoughts."
949.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
You iterate on your plan after it is generated step by step. You go and edit the prompt chain you started working on step 1 on, and modify it to start working on step 2 (including any ideas or fixes you have identified while implementing st
950.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
The main "issue" with this approach, is you can't iterate quickly. If your idea didn't pan out, you may have wasted some serious time on that one attempt. Not trying to knock it, just wanted to point out that there are p
951.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
I think part of the benefits of LoRA is that you can load the base model once, and then just swap out the vastly smaller LoRA fine-tune to fit the specific task it is working on.
952.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
In relation to this, when using GPT4, I have added the addendum to my prompts: "This seems like a lot of work, please split the work into two chunks, and let's start on the first chunk now." It will generally segment the prob
953.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
They have DeepMind they could release these models under, so the Google umbrella isn't tainted. I don't know, this feels like a bit suspect reasoning to me.
954.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
They have great temporal query features I know. Pretty much most of the advanced SQL standard they have implemented. More than any other at least.
955.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
Yeah, i've been incredibly surprised that this hasn't popped up yet. It just seems like a completely logical next step.
956.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
Yeah, this is the world they seem to be pushing for. An elite few who have unfettered access, and the masses who get nothing more than productized tools.
957.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
Yeah, honestly I see using a regular search index as a downside rather than benefit with this tech. Conflicting info, or low quality blogspam seem to trip these LLMs up pretty bad. Using curated search index seems like a much better use cas
958.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
That's not at all how I read that comment... more like "through a side channel, we found this out" rather than spelling out exactly where they found it.
959.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
You do realize that the current implementations get their context polluted by your prior conversation, right?
960.
▲
by
Tostino
4y ago
I may have not been clear, because I was talking about the RLHF dataset/training that OpenAI fine-tuned their models on which includes a whole bunch of question/answer format data to enable their fine-tuned models to handle that t
More ›