TooCreative

10 ms·

61.
by TooCreative 6y ago
For that to work, you have to import those explicitly: use something\Http; use something\Http\Method; use something\Http\URL; $body = Http::request(Method.GET, URL.Parse('https://example.com'))->body
62.
by TooCreative 6y ago
There is a certain quality to making the world more poetic. I like it.
63.
by TooCreative 6y ago
I can very well see similar statements in 20 years: "Not surprising considering that the vast majority of people just use robo taxis now. The ICE manufacturers did just fine in the transition to EVs. It was the transition to self-drivi
64.
by TooCreative 6y ago
And now instead of $body = Http::request('GET', 'https://example.com')['body']; You have to do this? $body = Http::request(new Method('GET'), new URL('https://e
65.
by TooCreative 6y ago
For the example I took a random line from Symfony and shortened it a bit: https://github.com/symfony/http-client/blob/master/HttpClien... You are free to link to some other example.
66.
by TooCreative 6y ago
For the example I simply took to a random, recently updated file from Symfony: https://github.com/symfony/http-client/blob/master/HttpClien... And shortened it a bit. In the real example, as you can see,
67.
by TooCreative 6y ago
That is just another piece of metadata. But it does not help either. Now you know you get an array of strings. But you still don't know what is inside of the strings. It might be ['headers'=>'...','body&#x27
68.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Attempts at facial reconstruction? What does this mean?
69.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Nikon's market cap is down 90% since the 2000s. I think with Canon it is similar - I can't find a long term chart right now though.
70.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Easier when you know how. It might be easier to cook dinner then to write a web app. But not for me :) Might be easier to build a digital camera then a film camera. But where is Polaroid now? Kodak also did not fare well in the transition t
71.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Wishful thinking. You know it returns an array, but you don't know what the array contains. So you don't know how to use it. You still need to look into the code to see what it returns. Then you will see that it returns an array a
72.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Compare this: private static function request(?string $method, ?string $url, array $options): array { ... } To this: function request($method, $url, $options) { ... } I can grasp the latter
73.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Which symptoms did you have and what is the underlying cause? I have a slight chronic sinusitis and I am currently trying a corticosteroid spray too. Studies seem to say it works against chronic sinusitus. I am not sure how though.
74.
by TooCreative 6y ago
That might be a matter of personal taste. How ones brain is wired. For me, types make code less expressive. I can grasp the structure of a piece of code the easier, the less meta data there is on top of the algorithmic structure.
75.
by TooCreative 6y ago
I code without types. My "proof", that types do not pay for themselves goes like this: Every time I encounter a bug (during coding, testing or in production) I make a note what type of bug it was and how it could have been prevent
76.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Rent and real estate are artificially low because of rent control. In a free market, the value decrease of money would be more visible compared to these assets. Calling the prise increase in equities a "bull market" does not chang
77.
by TooCreative 6y ago
If things were really different over the past decade than any other I did not state that. I only stated that FED-money doubled in 2010-2020 and the value of money halfed. I said nothing about any other decade. Maybe the same
78.
by TooCreative 6y ago
2010, when you say the fed started printing money I did not say the FED started printing money in 2010. I said nothing about the time before 2010 or about the future. Your argument would have been much more precise and usefu
79.
by TooCreative 6y ago
Over the last 10 years, the FED has more then doubled the amount of money they have out in the market. Other central banks have done the same. Despite popular belief, the value of money decreased by about 50% during this time. It is not eas
80.
Facebook Reports Third Quarter 2019 Results: Still Growing(investor.fb.com)
3 points by TooCreative 7y ago|0 comments
81.
by TooCreative 7y ago
Interesting. Just tried PaulStretch. While it sounds more "logical" without the strange micro-repeats, it takes all of the punch out of the music. On youtube, at x0.25 a drum hit goes from KABOUM! to something like: KAKAKABOBOBOBU
82.
by TooCreative 7y ago
Trying it now. At 0.3x it also has these weird ripples in the sound as if it just loops very short sequences. There must be a better way!
83.
by TooCreative 7y ago
This is cool. But the name is a bit misleading. I have the same 0.25x - 2x speed range on Youtube anyhow. What it adds is the looping capability. So this is rather LoopTube then SlowTube. By the way: It would be nice if something like this
84.
by TooCreative 7y ago
Why does this come up in 2019 for the first time? How did Newspapers, Radio and then TV handle this for the past 1200 years?
85.
Twitter is now below Stackoverflow on the Alexa top list(alexa.com)
2 points by TooCreative 7y ago|0 comments
86.
by TooCreative 7y ago
Aha, it is in navigator.platform! There is even more stuff in navigator, that should not be accessible to the website. For example how much ram my machine has in navigator.deviceMemory, how many cpu cores in navigator.hardwareConcurrency
87.
by TooCreative 7y ago
"17.63 bits of identifying information" for me. Strange, that they do not make use of the fact that browsers leak your local ip: https://browserleaks.com/webrtc This is one of the most glaring privacy holes build
88.
by TooCreative 7y ago
Displays with wrong aspect ratio for me. Which makes Steve Jobs look pretty fat. On YouTube, it has the correct aspect ratio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmCu97u35Ek How do we find the car of the uploader? Relevant XKCD
89.
by TooCreative 7y ago
e2e would not necessarily stop it. Since FB controls the apps that send and receive the message, they can do whatever they want to the unencrypted message on both sides.
90.
by TooCreative 7y ago
Aren't humans single-use too?

More ›