Tiberium

12 ms·

211.
by Tiberium 5mo ago
AI slop, it's obvious from the text, but just for the confirmation from Pangram (they have an extremely low false positive rate): https://www.pangram.com/history/6532dd71-bf24-4fc1-aadd-b97f...
212.
by Tiberium 5mo ago
I just want to comment that I think it's a good change if we look past the AI involvement. Bun has had an extremely high amount of crashes/memory bugs due to them using Zig, unlike Deno which is Rust. Of course, if Bun's Rust
213.
by Tiberium 5mo ago
Also relevant: https://git.sr.ht/~mcf/cproc is a C compiler on top of QBE
214.
by Tiberium 5mo ago
They absolutely can for simpler cases like this, especially recent GPT 5.x models are amazing at such lower-level compiler work.
215.
by Tiberium 5mo ago
Do you think with modern LLMs in a few years projects like Linux will have all those low-hanging security bugs fixed? Are we witnessing a transition period, or will nothing change?
216.
Why does it take so long to release black fan versions? (Noctua)(noctua.at)
3 points by Tiberium 6mo ago|0 comments
217.
Lovable leaks source code, secrets, chats for projects created before Nov 2025(twitter.com)
17 points by Tiberium 6mo ago|2 comments
218.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
Apparently this is officially documented at https://www.notion.com/help/public-pages-and-web-publishing#... buried in a note: > When you publish a Notion page to the web, the webpage’s metadata may include the names
219.
Notion leaks email addresses of all editors of any public page(twitter.com)
401 points by Tiberium 6mo ago|154 comments
220.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
Here's the actual prompt that causes this issue. It's not new, has been around for months. Older Claude models had no issues with it, but Opus 4.7 changed enough that it started misinterpreting it, and somehow Anthropic didn'
221.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
I hope people realize that tools like caveman are mostly joke/prank projects - almost the entirety of the context spent is in file reads (for input) and reasoning (in output), you will barely save even 1% with such a tool, and might ac
222.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
Seems like a very low-quality AI-assisted research repo, and it doesn't even properly test against Google's own SynthID detector. It's not hard at all (with some LLM assistance, for example) to reverse-engineer network reques
223.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
Yes, it's 5x more usage than Plus, and with the current promotions you actually get 10x more usage than Plus on the $100 plan until May 31st. Same for the $200 plan, it's still 2x its normal usage until that date.
224.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
It's not worse, Anthropic simply has no equivalent model (if you don't consider Mythos) of GPT 5.4 Pro. Google does though: Gemini 3.1 Deep Think. GPT 5.4 Pro is extremely slow but thorough, so it's not meant for the usual ag
225.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
Thanks for confirming my impressions, it's been like 4 months now that I've arrived at the same conclusions. GPT models are just better at any kind of low-level work: reverse engineering including understanding what the decompiled
226.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
From the article: > Anthropic’s commitment of $100M in model usage credits to Project Glasswing and additional participants will cover substantial usage throughout this research preview. Afterward, Claude Mythos Preview will be available
227.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
https://monyatwu.com/dailyblog/day29/ > ok so i was just doing marketing, we were uploading rumors and gossip about people.
228.
by Tiberium 6mo ago
Another slop blog post in HN top, not surprising.
229.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
Electron won even in the pre-LLM era, I sure wonder why.
230.
A leak reveals that Anthropic is testing a more capable AI model "Claude Mythos"(fortune.com)
66 points by Tiberium 7mo ago|24 comments
231.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
https://x.com/scaling01 has called out a lot of issues with ARC-AGI-3, some of them (directly copied from tweets, with minimal editing): - Human baseline is "defined as the second-best first-run human by action count&q
232.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
The only top comment in the thread that actually read past the title..
233.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
It's a single token in the most common usage, that is, with a space in front of it "This word is geschniegelt" is [2500, 2195, 382, 192786] Last token here is " geschniegelt"
234.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
Finally someone called it out, it's crazy that such posts get to the HN front page. Zenodo gets so much AI slop spam nowadays.
235.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
They did actually compare them in the tweet, see https://x.com/OpenAI/status/2033953592424731072 Direct image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HDoN4PhasAAinj_?format=png&name=...
236.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
I checked the current speed over the API, and so far I'm very impressed. Of course models are usually not as loaded on the release day, but right now: - Older GPT-5 Mini is about 55-60 tokens/s on API normally, 115-120 t/s wh
237.
Fixing request smuggling vulnerabilities in Pingora OSS deployments(blog.cloudflare.com)
1 points by Tiberium 7mo ago|0 comments
238.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
I have a suspicion that this paper is basically a summary with some benchmarks, done with LLMs.
239.
What if you never had to get an API key ever again?(stevekrouse.com)
2 points by Tiberium 7mo ago|1 comments
240.
by Tiberium 7mo ago
They don't actually seem to charge more for the >200k tokens on the API. OpenRouter and OpenAI's own API docs do not have anything about increased pricing for >200k context for GPT-5.4. I think the 2x limit usage for higher

More ›