ThrowMeAway1618

7 ms·

31.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>How does one respond constructively to a comment like this? How indeed? You certainly didn't.
32.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>Not participating in the trolley problem does not remove questions of moral responsibility. You had the choice to throw the lever, you said "either outcome is fine". As the eminent philosopher[0] opined: You can choose a
33.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>Friends and I have been threatened with violence multiple times by prominent members of one party and the other party does the same thing to other people. I would love to go into detail but I don't want to get doxxed because it is
34.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>But science is about questions demanding proof and rigor, verification, reproducible results. It's not about blindly saying "Yeah my questioning makes a bunch of unsupported claims equally valid". Asimov's take[0] on
35.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>What the universities are doing now is not conducive to scientific knowledge either. In fact, they produce a lot of anti-knowledge. Asimov was talking about you and those like you when he said[0]: There is a cult of ignorance in th
36.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>the US is simply so huge and diverse in thought and religion that you'll always be upsetting a large swath of people no matter what you decide. And Sir Peter Medawar agrees[0]: The USA is so enormous, and so numerous are its s
37.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
TL;DR Isn't there a video or a podcast of this? /s
38.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>The article discusses this, and explains why the sheriff is contorting the plain meaning of his 4-words and an image (about Kirk) into a threat of violence (to a nearby school). This won't stand in court, so they are punishing him
39.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>I specified "in the US" because I don't know enough for my thoughts on them to have any value. Yep. There. FTFY. And you're welcome.
40.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>In general the more difficult your degree the better it teaches you how to learn, because you are forced to learn more difficult stuff. How right you are! From now on I'm only hiring folks who created abiogenesis in a cereal bowl
41.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
I'm getting a little worried about you HNers. Granted, this is pretty obvious satire, but upvoting it? If you did, is it because you support murdering poor and disadvantaged people? I hope not. But some folks around here make me wonde
42.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
Yeah! A big problem. We should just Brian Kilmeade[0] them all, right? They're a burden on society and should be removed. But why stop there? The bottom 20% of school kids are just going to end up being a burden on society too! Pr
43.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>It’s been way too short a time to tell if this will work, but responding in a softer manner has proven to not. Might work is better than won’t work. Absolutely! As R.A. Lafferty correctly posited[0]: “When you have shot and killed
44.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
So those settlements were established under Rule .303, amirite?
45.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>republicans. that's what they are all about. if you voted for them, you willingly voted for this. demonrats. that's what they are all about. If you voted for them, you voted for baby molesting and baby eating. Those far-lef
46.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/sea-lions-royalty-f...
47.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>>Would be particularly interesting to see where they are in blue states >The answer is going to be "the snooty inner ring suburbs and wealthy rural-ish commuter communities that already had overstaffed PDs harassing teenagers
48.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>But you just said it's a ridiculous trope that people would want to charitably donate to the healthcare of others. How would you get the majority to support a single payer system when electing to help others is such a ridiculous tr
49.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>the USAID budget was about $20bn. Half a million extra dead so far from those cuts. So we can start there? Saving $40k/person[0] is wonderful savings! Let's save even more! Boo yah! USA! USA! USA! [0] I mean it's not
50.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
No. My thesis is that we can reduce total healthcare spending by having a single-payer system that covers everyone . It's not additional tax money, it's money that doesn't need to go to corporate jets and huge pay packa
51.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
Oh noes! I've been Poe's Law'd again! Mercy, mercy me! Or are you just spouting ridiculous tropes? Charity? Work-Trade? Loans? Paid by whom in that scenario? I'd expect you're more in line with Kilmeade than McC
52.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
https://www.csmonitor.com/ https://www.dw.com/en/top-stories/s-9097 https://www.economist.com/ There are many more. But why not start with these?
53.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>No, no one is entitled to the labor of others, not in this scenario where they are 3rd party to the damages. That doesn't even remotely make sense no matter how bad of a sob story you attach to it. Absolutely! We should just Brian
54.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>who is pushing the horrible left wing messaging that racism is bad? It's those triple-damned Demonrats! In between molesting and eating babies, they go on and on about "multiculturalism" and "systemic racism" a
55.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
And definitely not those cheese-eating surrender monkeys[0], amirite? Wow! That was hard work. I'm hungry. Gonna go get me some freedom fries. Yum! [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheese-eating_surrender_mon
56.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
¿Por que no los dos?
57.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>Not when it comes to broadcasting and FCC. They control the frequencies/channels allocated so they have some control about the speech there. Where did you get your law degree? Email your ConLaw professor and ask them about it. Bec
58.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>Yes, but the casings were engraved with things like "catch, fascist", so it's pretty clear the shooter fell into leftist propaganda Umm, not necessarily. Apparently, the engravings are used by right wing trolls[0][1][2],
59.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
>This is to prevent the government from weaponizing such declarations against political opponents. Yeah, but that's exactly what GP wants . A such, they're going to continue to argue for it as if it were a valid argument. Rep
60.
by ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago
When, exactly, did you stop beating your wife?

More ›