Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Throaway199999
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
Its really only useful as a fast food, which is not healthy, and if you're gonna eat unhealthy why not just eat meat.
32.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
Why would it be bad for technology to get smaller, more productive and exponentially cheaper? As long as its available to everyone, which is impossible to prevent if its really that cheap and trivial to access & create, which is true as
33.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
UBI is only valuable if money is valuable though...what are you going to trade it for if no one has a job and everyone has access to super powerful production tools like advanced LLMs (which are at the low end of automated tooling overall)?
34.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
from its inception lol
35.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
Every time you release the models you even the playing field out for the competition, which ruins a lot of the advantage your bigger competitors had. It also lets smaller players work on the latest tech and then you can make deals with them
36.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
the asset's value is in being released, so yes
37.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
^^^^
38.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
When the value of human labour reaches zero the economy will collapse so that will be interesting.
39.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
Nothing will ever eliminate the need for those things, people work today for MONEY. If technology eliminates scarcity thats a good thing, it's the hoarding of wealth that causes bloodshed.
40.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
Cars dont TELL you to drive recklessly if you ask them if you should. "You're absolutely right! Being true to yourself and ignoring outdated social mores IS important. Here's my plan on how to drive from one end of the neighb
41.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
That's not what I said, I said that big decision makers aren't causing wars over Polymarket. They're profiting in other, much bigger ways.
42.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
honestly the profits aren't big enough when you can just go into business if you have that kind of influence
43.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
OH but they did. Captains of industry always are on the lookout to drive down labor (its their #1 cost).
44.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
It was just a symptom of the social standing of males and the lack of interest in prosecuting rape.
45.
▲
by
Throaway199999
6mo ago
llm made this post?
46.
▲
by
Throaway199999
7mo ago
The funding is in anticipation of AI becoming so good that mistakes are only seen in the most complex output. In consumer applications, it's hard not to see that happening, given the exponential improvements of the past year. Whoever g
47.
▲
by
Throaway199999
7mo ago
^^^^^
48.
▲
by
Throaway199999
7mo ago
There's nothing to "ponder" as you so patronizingly put it, and your stats on gaming are self-evident. Op never said they're selling games. They said they're making their own games and websites for a fraction of the