TheHypnotist

35 ms·

361.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Not only that but they will drive the whole efficient and affordability premise into the ground just for the betterment of their drivers. In this case, with the competition being what it is, it would be more for the detriment.
362.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Yeah but in this case no one who works for Uber is forced to actually do any work. This is an ad hoc, "I feel like making a few extra bones" type deal where they provide an affordable and convenient service to the populace. To say
363.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
As a resident of New Jersey, please, no more unions.
364.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
This would hurt the ego's of those who spend so much time carefully cultivating their Facebook persona. That said, they already have an invisible dislike button in "I don't want to see this."
365.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Well, as it's been pointed out there is a stronger underlying issue as to Uber's ban than simply a rape. But I don't really understand your point anyway.
366.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Agreed. It's also not as if these sexual assault cases are not well documented already. I wonder what Uber will say about this.
367.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
I like the idea, however, I am still hesitant to bet on eSports especially given the recent cheating scandal in games like CS:GO. http://kotaku.com/top-counter-strike-players-caught-in-big-c...
368.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
I like this article because as someone who struggles with learning to code, I have found myself making it worse by jumping from language to language, learning the very basics of their syntax. Great, I can FizzBuzz in 4 different languages,
369.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Right, the point is we still have a choice in who represents us, or what appears to be the illusion of a choice.
370.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
I was wondering about this. Is there the potential it could cause the TV to throw an error?
371.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
I never understood why this is an acceptable thing to do. It's democracy except you get to pick who votes for you and who doesn't, so, it's actually not.
372.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
This is more or less what I got out of it. Perhaps moreso is the effect that portable devices (phones, gameboys, whatever new gameboys are called) have on people. You have the addiction but there isn't a place you can safely escape to.
373.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
It moves into full screen. That might do it. Worked on my chrome.
374.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
I don't know the salaries of Yahoo US vs Yahoo India, but please explain how cutting employees in any country isn't a way of reducing costs.
375.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Ah, that makes sense. This way he doesn't get caught a day outside the month with no fare. Thank you.
376.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
I'm sorry, the unlimited time limit? Can you explain that, please?
377.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
You're right. I guess I have too much faith in the average user to not pick a question with a potentially obvious or easily discovered answer to it.
378.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Don't most companies use this very same "insecure" system? 99% of the population won't have this problem because not even some of your closest friends know what street you grew up on or your mother's maiden name. If
379.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Perhaps "aware" was a poor choice of words. Fact is, you can break this down many ways but it almost always boils down to money and who is contributing how much to who else. Visibility is costly. Which, not to lose sight of the ar
380.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
You are correct but there are third party options. Voting for the "lesser of two evils" is poisonous and the public should be made aware of third++ parties.
381.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
It's worse, actually.
382.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
Serious Question(s): How does this make them look bad? Is it unfair to think that this happens to be because of the demographic of people interested and qualified in "tech" positions? Or should we genuinely think these numbers are
383.
by TheHypnotist 12y ago
According to this article ( http://www.spacenews.com/article/launch-report/41428spacex-s... ) they were firings, not layoffs. Which may throw a wrench in their lawsuit.