Terretta

8 ms·

61.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Importantly, anyone can get SOC2 (Type 1) by claiming some controls they figure they'll look at themselves. SOC2 (Type 2) in theory requires an audit that you're actually doing what you said you'd do in (Type 1). Both may als
62.
by Terretta 3mo ago
The design previews are all the missing thumbnail icon… More importantly, are the customers of YOUR customers exclusively devs? If the customers of your customers could include small businesses, then the stack you offer them should prob be
63.
by Terretta 3mo ago
for local LLM, obvious choice: idle = doesn't have to be H200 speeds uses macs = local LLM can use all the ram, be smarter as for hosted models, potato is tasty
64.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Fitz, Dave, whoever is "here" ... What prompt are you using to generate this exact form of thing? Problem history story... Everyone's doing it wrong... Proof of claims ... Abstract ... "Honest" bustedness ... Keywor
65.
by Terretta 3mo ago
> comprehension trumps context Consider context as hyper-dimensional coordinate vectors gesturing at the starting concept cluster of a synthesis chain or thread to unspool. If the model's comprehensive training activated by your c
66.
by Terretta 3mo ago
sure it's not pronounced Kenobi? they stylize it k•no•b or k•no•b1 take your pick
67.
by Terretta 3mo ago
https://github.com/Pylons/pylons keyword collision: `framework`
68.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Sit with that for a second.* * is in the article
69.
by Terretta 3mo ago
you have a premise at the heart of that: > understanding anything in the way humans do i'm not sure it's clearly established LLMs can't be a model of some part of “the way humans do” ? to be more specific, i'd argu
70.
by Terretta 3mo ago
> simple changes to SwiftUI interfaces I’ve one-shot is always a frustrating experience for me 1) Have you exported Apple docs from Xcode and provided those to your LLM and told your CLAUDE.md to read them as applies? 2) Have you added
71.
by Terretta 3mo ago
It talks out loud to hear itself think. So, it doesn't fully know what it thought until it's said it. No joke. To overcome it seeing your phrase and using it more, try to convey the concept you want it to say "found an indic
72.
by Terretta 3mo ago
The presentation of the idea steers it into it. Early on, it mattered to say "Avoid" (an active word) "action", rather than "Do" (affirmative) "not" (negation) "action" (affirmative again).
73.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Fairly certain it's when its confidence level is too low on the right word, it hits a stock phrase instead. When you see the metaphor or euphemism or simile is off, the selection is not quite apt, it seems the stock phrase or term is r
74.
by Terretta 3mo ago
> the concept being referred to is clearly extremely important and valuable to refer to On the contrary, stock words pop up more easily when it has less confidence. Stock phrases are a correctness smell .
75.
by Terretta 3mo ago
I hope it's actually talking to itself at higher bandwidth, and hope this is because of training that succeeds better given quality inter-agent communication. For those who care to read everything rather than walk away, Fable can be ex
76.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Yes, it's like corrective scar tissue in the final output.
77.
by Terretta 3mo ago
WTH is a "fold"? I think Claude means something like map-reduced or at least a functionally derived series of some kind? Anything with series data sounds like a laundromat.
78.
by Terretta 3mo ago
> Cookies also don't work on mobile Instead of speculating, I'll ask: what does this mean?
79.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Same problem, same solution: For technical docs, tell it when facts change, rewrite as if the wrong fact never happened, with no references or even allusions to the obsolete fact or the change. It's been effective. From time to time I
80.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Contentless article, roughly children's school primer level. TL;DR: Drones see shapes as patterns. Paint other patterns on shapes, the drones get confused. If you want to keep confusing drones as their programming learns to recogniz
81.
by Terretta 3mo ago
85%* of small to midsize biz in United States are on Microsoft's office platform, not Google Workspace and Gmail. starting with indies and SV startups and education is less risky, but the real market outside startup culture is often ov
82.
by Terretta 3mo ago
> leads to poor compilation times for any language that uses llvm as a backend it doesn't take long for user delay to sum to more than developer delay
83.
by Terretta 3mo ago
At the level of this question, with most responses addressing Odin versus Rust or Go as in the question, I'd have been curious for community thoughts adding in Nim and Swift (now that Swift is on Linux and in any IDE that can use Sourc
84.
by Terretta 3mo ago
dnspatter (dns spatter + dns patter)
85.
by Terretta 3mo ago
I wanted to like this and appreciated the genAI tokens were teased into a less AI-ish vernacular, but surfaces and honest caveats drifted back too far to overcome the "I'm human" signaling attempted through lowercase sentence
86.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Refreshingly written. And like wading into the ocean on a surprisingly hot spring day, bracing. At most any given scope, "most" systems you interact with aren't under your own control. For this, consider: because that's
87.
by Terretta 3mo ago
Extrapolate the flight time from NYC to London in 1976 ... have you seen the J-curve? Or extrapolate the curve for self driving cars once they were only "two years away". Catch is, tech progress is not one curve. It's overla
88.
by Terretta 3mo ago
A spider graph or radar chart of mutually exclusive 1d characteristics conveys information through the geometry of 2d areas. Here, the 3d is not conveying anything as the volumes within are not MECE qualia spaces -- like sorts or like kinds
89.
by Terretta 3mo ago
First, OP's tool is cool, and worth trying. Yours as well, though when I see a vibed tool with no commits I wonder if the author is still using it themselves or achieved perfection. :-) Meanwhile, the other todo list take, one I'
90.
by Terretta 3mo ago
It's like that old saying: “Don't attribute to malice – or incompetence – that which can be explained by path dependency.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_dependence OK, not the saying. Perhaps should be

More ›