Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Tepix
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
55 ms
·
871.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
For me, Amazon is a prime example of this. The search is so abysmal, it shows me wrong results intermixed with the thing i am searching for - why? In the hope that i see something that interests me. I've bought two wrong things acciden
872.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Google is likely to have 1000 people or so working on Chrome and Chromium. That's going to be difficult to maintain. If OpenAI takes over i expect Chrome and Chromium to go closed source.
873.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Microsoft Edge is relying on Chromium being contiously developed by Google, isn't it? Not a hard fork that no longer receives updates from upstream.
874.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Here's what the license states: You do not sell or otherwise commercialise the Work or Derivative Works as a Game Engine Product. "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made
875.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Yes!
876.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
FWIW, i haven't had any real issues with QNAP since 10 years or so, but i'm pretty much only using basic features. Once i added a 4th drive to a RAID 5 set and i was impressed that it performed the operation on-line. Neat. Oh, the
877.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
What if someone takes your jacket and removes your name tag and sews his own tag to your jacket though?
878.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
on-premises https://twominenglish.com/premise-vs-premises/
879.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Google already has large scale surveillance of large parts of the internet thanks to their tracking cookies that are used for google analytics. They can track individual users, not just get some statistics.
880.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
You have have to write your own map editor if you want to sell it, yes.
881.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
> Seems fair, but sadly not OSS. Which of their license changes makes you feel sad and why? Were you planning to sell their editor?
882.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
I agree that the license looks fair. Not everything has to be OSI-compliant open source. They even support WASM!
883.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
You think all research should adhere to what the current administration likes? Does that seem like a good idea to you?
884.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
The emperor is not wearing any clothes. It's obvious if you see measures like web pages getting deleted because they contain the word "privilege". You know, as in "privilege escalation". I'm sure the people at
885.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
I feel sorry for all these agencies and (aspiring) scientists. I hope they find a safe place elsewhere. I'm left wondering if this administration and its henchmen will manage to do the opposite of what the Apollo program left the US in
886.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Google will likely see who accesses which papers
887.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
How many lives did those CT scans save vs. how many lives were lost due to the additional cancer cases they caused? That's the question, isn't it?
888.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Related: " Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say it's all been downhill since Clippy " https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/11/windows_2000_best_mic... https://news.yc
889.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Why do you think so?
890.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Not in 1999.
891.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
I don't :-)
892.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Filtering them?
893.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Needs a (1999) tag
894.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
100 Wh, with LiIon usually around 27Ah
895.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
It‘s sad to read through this article on Tom‘s that a) awfully reads like an ad and b) manages not to mention the screen resolution of AR glasses used as a desktop replacement!
896.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Time for them to finally disappear
897.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
I used something simpler for 20€ for a while to indicate my busy status: https://www.getdigital.de/pages/offlineprodukt/usb-mail-meld... I guess it‘s no longer for sale. It even worked with Linux. I wrote some she
898.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
Beyond 60V it gets dangerous... i'm ok with staying at 60V or below.
899.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
https://archive.is/EPZnP
900.
▲
by
Tepix
2y ago
No, apple only has 125% tariffs on imports from China to the US. They can send them elsewhere (or parts) and send India-made devices to the US instead for example.
More ›