Tenoke

9 ms·

61.
by Tenoke 7mo ago
I think LeCun has been so consistently wrong and boneheaded for basically all of the AI boom, that this is much, much more likely to be bad than good for Europe. Probably one of the worst people to give that much money to that can even rais
62.
by Tenoke 8mo ago
Nobody out of people remotely worth listening to. There's always people deeply wrong about things but over 70 years at this point is a pretty insane position unless you have a great reason like expecting Taiwan to get bombed tomorrow a
63.
by Tenoke 10mo ago
Yes, this sounds made-up/not Ryanair. I've used them for over a decade, paid with many different cards and have never encountered this with them (nor anywhere ever really).
64.
by Tenoke 11mo ago
How is it internal or speculative? Chatgpt is the 5th most poplar website. Gemini is 30th but they have increasing demand and a ton of it isn't on the gemini main site. And that isn't their only external demand of coruse.
65.
by Tenoke 1y ago
>rational adult of sound mind”, and “rational” there easily disqualifies every human being on the planet, with all our evolved biases, heuristics, and common predictable misjudgments. If only they had someone deeply familiar with the fie
66.
by Tenoke 1y ago
Exactly this tho with more than just 2 categories. You find more than ever optimized for the 60s category, that's true, and you do get longform silos - but those include one silo of channels that clock around 10m, as well as another in
67.
by Tenoke 1y ago
>OpenAI is losing a brutal amount of money, possibly on every API request you make to them as they might be offering those at a loss (some sort of "platform play", as business dudes might call it, assuming they'll be able
68.
by Tenoke 1y ago
For better or worse, OpenAI removing the capped structure and turning the nonprofit from AGI considerations to just philanthropy feels like the shedding of the last remnants of sanctity.
69.
by Tenoke 1y ago
>Complaint chat models will be trained to start with "Certainly! They are certainly biased that way but there's also some 'i don't know' samples in rlhf, possibly not enough but it's something they think abo
70.
by Tenoke 1y ago
I'm not. Again, you might be processing the variable for logging or saving or passing elsewhere as well or many other reasons unrelated to sanitization.
71.
by Tenoke 1y ago
I'm not sure why you think it's harder to use them without sanitization - there is nothing inherent about checking the value in it, it's just a nice use. You might have implemented the t-string to save the value or log it bet
72.
by Tenoke 1y ago
Again, just because a function accepts a t string it doesn't mean there's sanitization going on by default.
73.
by Tenoke 1y ago
The sanitization. Just using a t-string in your old db.execute doesn't imply anything safer is going on than before.
74.
by Tenoke 1y ago
No, just `db.execute(f"QUERY WHERE name = {db.safe(name)}")` And you add the safety inside db.safe explicitly instead of implicitly in db.execute. If you want to be fancy you can also assign name to db.foos inside db.safe to use i
75.
by Tenoke 1y ago
The article talked about it but the example here just assumes they'll be there.
76.
by Tenoke 1y ago
db.safe same as the new db.execute with safety checks in it you create for the t-string but yes I can see some benefits (though I'm still not a fan for my own codebases so far) with using the values further or more complex cases than t
77.
by Tenoke 1y ago
Then the useful part is the extra execute function you have to write (it's not just a substitute like in the comment) and an extra function can confirm the safety of a value going into a f-string just as well. I get the general case, b
78.
by Tenoke 1y ago
I don't see what it adds over f-string in that example?
79.
by Tenoke 1y ago
Having errors is not the user error - Google will also return you bad results but I'd still consider it user error if someone can't avoid the bad results well enough to find some use for it.
80.
by Tenoke 1y ago
But it is able to tell if a statement is true or false, as in it can predict whether it is true or false with much above 50% accuracy.
81.
by Tenoke 1y ago
>The AI revolution has mostly been a hardware revolution. It's certainly important but this reads as overly simplistic to me. All the hardware we have today won't make an SVM or a random forest scale the way transformers do.
82.
by Tenoke 1y ago
> It just so happens that sometimes that non-deterministic text aligns with reality, but you don’t really know when and neither does the model. This is overly simplistic and demonstratably false - there's plenty of scenarios where a
83.
by Tenoke 1y ago
Much, much less was being poured into AI until it started to have some returns.
84.
by Tenoke 1y ago
I can relate and it is something I'm thinking about as I have a post I'd like to try reposting without coming off as spammy. In this case, the repost was indeed worth it as far as I can tell.
85.
by Tenoke 1y ago
I get it but for what is worth, the accepted behavior here is that you can repost eventually but you should wait significantly longer than a day before doing so. > Are reposts ok? >If a story has not had significant attention in the l
86.
by Tenoke 1y ago
I can empathize. Part of what we require seems to be better detection and signaling of which accounts are most and least likely to be human but I'm not sure if we'll get that in the biggest forums. LLMs can practically pass the Tu
87.
My Day in 2035(svilentodorov.xyz)
3 points by Tenoke 1y ago|1 comments
88.
by Tenoke 1y ago
Partially inspired by AI 2027, I've put to paper a day in one of the more optimistic scenarios I envision which are realistic to me.
89.
by Tenoke 2y ago
..The first person listed is ex-OpenAI.
90.
by Tenoke 2y ago
GPT-2 for example came out in 2019. Chat GPT wasn't the start of GPT.

More ›