TeaBrain

31 ms·

241.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
You've misinterpreted their comment. US companies that offshore usually have offices in other countries and these offshore offices typically have stricter RTO policies than the onshore offices. They weren't saying that all of the
242.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
To your edit, you are still making an assumption of pettiness on the part of God. These "swear" words are nothing but wind. They have no impact on the world. If God is invested in the world, then is probable that only those word
243.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
I'm not claiming that it did not exist before Constantine, but the question at hand is whether the institution was formalized by Christ.
244.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
As God, simple words like this would be like a small breeze to a great mountain. As I said, to be offended by this would require pettiness which I would have a hard time believing would be possible for such. As a human believer, I think y
245.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Just to clear up a possible misunderstanding, the word church in the bible is derived from a word that simply meant assembly, as in an assembly of people. The above poster was referring to the institution of the church, which wasn't f
246.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
I doubt anyone so wise would be so petty.
247.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
From my perspective, it had already devolved when you started making dishonest whataboutisms and accusations of being "indoctrinated" in your comments. Just to humor you though, what is the "truth" that you say you were
248.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Not only is it blatant whataboutism, but the whataboutist analogies for the US of Alaska, Palestine and Cuba are also completely nonsensical, as the US didn't conquer any of them. I suppose though that being nonsensical is on theme fo
249.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
This is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure the Chinese I've met have been taught this technique. Also, I don't think most people in any given country usually get depressed about GDP numbers. They'll more likely get d
250.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Is this what they were referring to by "civil war" or were they referring to the possibility of a civil war breaking out between provinces in the PRC due to their mention of the economic bubble bursting.
251.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Or the other countries like the Philippines and Vietnam that dispute China's excessive maritime claims. That claim isn't really surprising in light of the rest of their comment which is essentially repeating the PRC creation myth
252.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Looks like you only read the first paragraph of their comment.
253.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Apes aren't monkeys.
254.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
In the US, dentistry isn't a specialization of medicine. Medical specializations have to go to medical school then residency first before specializing. Dentists just go to dental school. Dentists in the US aren't medical doctor
255.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Where did you get the idea for that query in the first place?
256.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
For people that want to have a child, and not trying to justify their lack of ability to have one, "ROI" doesn't factor into it. I think you are attributing way to much credibility to your imaginary conception of why people w
257.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Are you claiming this because you believe one side has a monopoly on the truth?
258.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
It helps to understand your misconception. Less than a fourth of the US armed forces are in or will ever get put into a combat role.
259.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
The parent of their comment seems to be confused by how the EPA and IARC are not related, so I don't think they do have a point. Prior to my comment, the comment you responded to originally posed the question of whether the EPA could b
260.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
The parent comment's mention of the IARC list is completely irrelevant. IARC doesn't have anything to do with the EPA. Edit: Prior to it being edited, the comment I responded to here posed the question to the original IARC commen
261.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Why bring this IARC list up out of the blue? The parent comment mentioned an EPA classification and you brought up a list of IARC classifications. The EPA and IARC frequently disagree on their classifications.
262.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
I enjoyed the book, but I'm still not sure how it's been classified as science fiction, despite clearly having been pigeonholed into the category. The book has very little to do with real or speculative science. It was also one of
263.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
>At which point it really makes no difference if you physically reside within city limits or live in a suburban/rural area as the time and effort to get to the places that cater to your particular niche approaches being about the sa
264.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
What in particular made you feel this way about The City and The City? Like what were you expecting prior to the reveal?
265.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
I don't think this is necessarily converse to what they said.
266.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
Atlas Shrugged was her objectivist/philosophy of selfishness novel and it's a terribly wooden and poorly written work of literature. The Fountainhead and Anthem were both written before the formalizing of objectivism and are much
267.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
I wasn't saying anything from my point of view. I was simply explaining the misinterpretation in the comment above, though I should have said biomarker instead of genetic marker.
268.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
No one claimed disorders don't exist.
269.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
It may leave someone more susceptible to bacterial infections, but the idea that it leaves a person more vulnerable to cancer is unsubstantiated. Tumor growth is dependent on the growth signaling mechanism that Rapamycin suppresses, which
270.
by TeaBrain 2y ago
You misinterpreted the part of the comment you referred to. They aren't referring to redefining the word "disorder", but "the disorder", as in "ADHD". What they were referring to with the definition is h

More ›