Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
TeMPOraL
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
721.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
I need the inverse of that - an app that predicts how badly a given street will be baked by the sun at current or near-future time, will there be any shadow zone from the buildings, how far will the usable extent of it reach (e.g. not much
722.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
Maybe this have changed over the years, and I rarely if ever used these combinations to switch to TTY except for emergency (OOM, or window manager breakage), but on every Linux system I ever used, graphical mode was on (Ctrl+Alt+)F7.
723.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
I built my whole career on focusing on the wrong thing. In fact, focusing on the right thing makes me slow down, struggle, and get bogged down with frustration. I still learn 10+x faster when focusing on the wrong thing, and after two decad
724.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
People talk like "status quo" was inherently a bad thing, and that any change to it is good by default. On the contrary, "status quo" is usually a hard-won place, a foothold against strong tides, a position that you try
725.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
Counter-counter-argument: for LLMs, tokens are units of thinking. And token use is, on the margin, directly proportional to costs of inference. So while the details of the harness, and how you prompt the model, and nature of the code and do
726.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
What do you think they do all day? The larger pattern is not unique to writing code. Think of it next time a reorg comes, or some random thing gets "improved" in the name of "efficiency" only management seems to see.
727.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
Depends on what you're optimizing for. I'd hope that "after the subsidy ends", the "cheaper/local providers" will be at the level of at least current SOTA models. If not, then there's hardly a point u
728.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
Or, you could fit the exactly opposite story to the same data: Growth is when you want to have institutional support, to be at the tip, backed by infinite money and best compute infra, and benefit disproportionally from compounding. Convers
729.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
At least in this case we're talking about someone doing something useful and providing tons of value to the field, not about people being praised for starting a company and raising money.
730.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
> - Memory market cornering (...) Wait, what? What is that? > - Fast penetration of IP exfiltrating tools in companies world-wide. That goes on the benefit side, I believe. > - Autonomous agents killing Open Source by siphonin
731.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
And Claude can actually tackle it the same way as humans do - here in the real world, where we don't have time to let some nonsense like "mathematically proven to be unsolvable" to stand between us and our goals: it can eyeb
732.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
> ... because there are open source tools that implement these things properly? Take Darktable, if you try to build an alternative because you "just want to do a bit of color grading" you will produce garbage. ... only if you
733.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
5mo ago
IDK, but I have three or four vibe-coded 0.1%-Photoshops already - small utility apps, all self-contained, client-side, static, zero build-step browser tools, each of them solving a very particular problem for me. Things like, drop an image
734.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
Most people also understand that, because they're not "frequent" users of a thing, they absolutely suck at using it, and set their expectations accordingly. In particular, they realize that doing anything non-trivial with the
735.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
What disposability? Kerbals were never disposable! If you crash your little green astronauts on some moon or planet, you're supposed to send a rescue mission after them. And should that rescue fail too, stranding more Kerbals, you just
736.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
> Because while humans invent cants/argots all the time to hide what they're talking about (Polari and rhyming slang being the most famous in recent history), agents are much more alike each other than like us even when they&#
737.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
Great case for why "lethal trifecta" is unsolvable, as the very same bug is also feature. > "My [agent who churns through tokens at the rate of 100 humans|my team of 100 humans] encountered the message 'this is the p
738.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
One man's useless trivia is another man's ideas for a project name :).
739.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
It's novel if you never played with img2img, including especially several forms of (text+img)2img. Or, if you never tried editing images by text prompt in recent multimodal LLMs. That said, I spent plenty of time doing both, and yet it
740.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
ComfyUI?
741.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
> Hardware is cheap ; human labor is not. Especially true when you're paying for neither hardware nor labor. Writing inefficient client-side software, whether it's desktop or webshit, makes the customers / users pay fo
742.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
Funny analogy, in that when the high caliber shells start raining, most forms of cover won't make a difference. The ones that will, are not something you want to stay behind on days when you're not being actively bombed. In fact,
743.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
Doesn't change the argument. As long as the models are open, the big cloud providers have strict advantage, because even if some open model gets ahead, they can just serve it from their infra, and do it better than everyone else. This
744.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
From technical POV that's true, but that was still a niche area at the time, mostly ignored in the broader tech community. So wrt. the broader tech world discussing harnesses, I'd still use November 2022 as the reference point.
745.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
I'm not saying we need to overload phasing, but rather to not treat the trifecta like a regular security vulnerability. As defined originally, the trifecta is analogous to phishing, but of course it's only a small subset of the is
746.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
That makes no sense, though, and reeks of extrapolating a trend way beyond the conditions in which it is valid. The simple truth is, cloud models are always going to be strictly superior to open ones, simply because cloud model vendors can
747.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
There were no LLMs between 2018 and 2022, at least not in the sense resembling today. The whole LLM frenzy started in late 2022.
748.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
> Effectively you have an arm of the lethal trifecta and pretending otherwise is more dangerous than helpful. "Lethal trifecta" is basically describing phishing but in a way more palatable to people who would rather die bef
749.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
In which case the market is working as intended.
750.
▲
by
TeMPOraL
6mo ago
I'd say the core is that the harness/runtime/${whatever you call it} doesn't just unconditionally sends model output to the user, and user input to the model, +/- some post-processing, but instead runs a loop that f
More ›