Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Tainnor
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
541.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
Your whole argument boils down to "don't write shit software" which yeah, fair, but in the real world, the company that you just joined has shit code that evolved over 10 years and has accumulated all sorts of legacy cruft. T
542.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
None of what you wrote is covered under any reasonable definition of "facts". It's literally all just your opinion.
543.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
Apart from the fact that not everyone uses Visual Studio, "connected services" appears to be something by which you can connect to existing cloud-based services. How does that solve the problem of a mess of interconnected services
544.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
That's a style of discussion that goes nowhere. Either you believe in an argument, then you should be prepared to defend it - or you don't. Saying "I don't actually believe this, but lots of people do, so we should take
545.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
Not trite at all. Bad code and bad architectures are a reality. You can fix them in theory, but that takes a lot of time and needs to be done incrementally. In the meantime, you have to live with the problem at hand.
546.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> Most services are written in Go though and are pretty lightweight That's probably the difference. Throw elasticsearch, kafka and a bunch of Java services in and you'll be easily exhausting your RAM (at least at startup).
547.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
You can't compare Microsoft to your run-of-the-mill small (or even large) software shop, though. Maybe on HN, most people work on these amazingly designed systems, but in my experience most tech out there is shit and has no proper desi
548.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
I'm sure companies with well designed and properly isolated services exist but... in my time spent at several companies, "microservices" invariably degenerate to distributed monoliths.
549.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
One time at a corporate retreat, we had to fill out each others' "friend books" (I'm not making this up). One question was about our personal motto. I wrote down "Hell is other people" - I think some people too
550.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
Even if it was indeed fully optional and nobody felt the obligation to share even though they didn't want to (which I find hard to believe), you have to consider that you're also imposing on the people who are listening. They didn
551.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
This has nothing to do with it. I'm not from the US and I find this deeply unprofessional.
552.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
Yeah but you don't form strong social bonds through awkward team exercises. The best team I worked on was super high performing and we did end up sharing personal stuff on our spare time eventually (and some of us are still friends yea
553.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
It's funny how people in this thread are arguing that the 10% isn't a big deal when we have TFA describing how they shared personal details about their divorce upon hearing this prompt, and that other people apparently shared even
554.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> no matter how trendy the culture is about being “open” I've noticed this trend in recent years to be "open about mental health", etc. And I think by itself this is great, mental health is important. But invariably, espec
555.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> Almost like adult people can understand environment and make conscious decisions what is acceptable [...] Apparently not because in TFA, the author shared personal facts about their divorce and other people shared even "deeper&quo
556.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> how they got clean off drugs which would probably even work okay because everyone loves and applauds a success story or something that isn't your fault, but imagine someone sharing their ongoing drug addiction. People who think
557.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
"Are you planning to have children? You don't have to answer"
558.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
This is definitely not what anyone would think of when prompted to "be vulnerable".
559.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> The best thing I think Rails still has is ActiveAdmin. Everything else, I really can take or leave. ActiveAdmin gets you off the ground very quickly, but is also extremely inflexible (and, IIRC, poorly maintained). The last time I wo
560.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> Well, the manager asked only for “10% more vulnerable”. And they have absolutely no right to do that. "Being vulnerable" is not part of any job description.
561.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
I agree and this wasn't the only red flag in the post for me. The reverence for a company that does, in the end, "just" process payments or the part about "a billionaire liked my project"... I feel like there's
562.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
Because knowing how you derive arithmetic from axioms isn't necessary for mathematical modeling. Mostly only logicians, theoretical computer scientists etc . need to know about PA. Euler and Gauss didn't know about PA (it hadn
563.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
You don't even have to go back in time or use a comparatively rare language pair such as English/Russian. Google Reviews insists on auto translating reviews to your native language (thankfully, the original review can be recovered
564.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> I've created new apps from scratch with it. I don't think that "creating new apps from scratch" should be the benchmark. Unless you're doing something very novel, creating a new app/service is rather formu
565.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
If you use numerical methods routinely, you need to know about error propagation too, otherwise you may get results that are completely wrong. That's theory too, although of a different kind than the typical symbolic calculus.
566.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> I'm not saying x+1=7 is a good example of that. Exactly, it's not. I'm not arguing with what you're saying, I'm arguing with what GP wrote.
567.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> I made it an easy equation to make a point It was a bad example then. Obviously there are equations that are difficult to solve by hand and you don't need to remember all tricks in order to do successful modeling, but if you'
568.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
No.
569.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
I'm sorry, but if you don't know how to solve x+1=7, you don't actually understand maths.
570.
▲
by
Tainnor
2y ago
> EDIT: As usual in some Linux forums, I got a bunch of marketing replies about all the cool ideas NixOS is supposed to bring as if I haven't read about them myself in LWN and other Linux sources I routinely check on. That's be
More ›