Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
TZubiri
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
961.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
They seem totally unrelated to the Internet Archive. They probably only ever got on Wikipedia by leeching of the IA brand and confusing enough people to use them
962.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
Coming from someone with an almost ascetic dependency discipline, I look at some meta-dependencies as an outsider (dependabot, pnpm/yarn, poetry/venv/pipenv, snap/flatpak), a solution to too many dependencies that is yet
963.
▲
NullFramework: A no-op framework (for Python)
(github.com)
2 points
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
|
3 comments
964.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
This is how I program. It's very minimalist, I try to use as few dependencies and possible. It has its pros and it has its cons: Pros: - No external vulnerabilities - Almost everyone can understand the code, easy onboarding of more dev
965.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
You can map tokens to CPU instructions and train a model on that, that's what they do for input images I think. I think the main limitation on the current models is not that cpu instructions aren't cpu instructions (even though th
966.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
Fun technical note: >"Begin with ‘Yes.’ or ‘No.’ followed by a brief explanation. ”" GPT models generate tokens from left to right, they are causal. That prompt causes the model to lock in to an answer and then generate the exp
967.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
It's not trained for agentic coding I don't think
968.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
No version control?
969.
▲
by
TZubiri
8mo ago
You think they are able to see their output and iterate on it? Or is it pure token generation?
970.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
I didn't see today's ToS change. But this was always against ToS. OpenClaw specifically is built against tech that breaks ToS. Probably the ToS change was to make it more clear. To be fair, the developer is the one breaking the To
971.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
Read the ToS, you are paying to use their products. If you want to use other products that integrate with the Anthropic LLMs they offer a product which is the API. You can use Opencode by connecting your API and being charged per token. Doe
972.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
But this ban is precisely on circumventing the API.
973.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
Sure they are having a blast, they are paying 20$ instead of getting charged hundreds for forr tokens. It's simple, follow the ToS
974.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
There's many concerns about the safety of our new nuclear fusion car. In order to test whether it is safe, we created a little experiment to see if auditors can get it to misbehave. Also, for this experiment we didn't give the key
975.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
If this is a defender win, the lesson is, design a CtF experiment with as much defender advantage as possible and don't simulate anything useful at all.
976.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
I know, what I was expressing was: an increase of X ELO points doesn't have a significant meaning, as an increase of points from 1000 to 1200, would be very different from an increase of points from 1500 to 1700, and very different to
977.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
It all depends on the nuances of the search and the board evaluation. I've done a traditional search based engine, you can try playing against it. It plays out as you mention, you beat it positionally. But tbh if you play against a sea
978.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
Just to confirm, did you read Cosmo's article (cosmo.tardis.uk black background), or the girl.surgery (white background) article? ML isn't my strong suit so I wouldn't be able to explain how, but Cosmo's article is almos
979.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
Nono, the claim is not that it is produced by an llm, rather that author researches the subject with llms and generally is a high frequency user. A common property of llm psychosis is the development of an internal vocabulary that the llm l
980.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
>and at the federal level, the legal liability is on the person who posts it, not who hosts the tool. this was a mistake that will likely be corrected over the next six years [citation needed] Historically hosts have always absolutely be
981.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
I know a fair deal about the subject of chess AI, but when I was reading this and I didn't understand. I was polarized, was I reading a mastermind that was way above my level? Or someone way too confident that learned enough buzzwords
982.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
I guess 1.0001 ^2 is quadratic too, but note how it really only charges you 1.5x for more output tokens. Even if cost were quadratic with output length here, we are talking about a very small difference, nothing like the quadratic cost stru
983.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
Have you taken a look at Picture Insect and Picture this (for plants, original). the incumbents are very specialized, making a simple app for all nature sounds ambitious. I never did find one for bird sounds, but that would be an interestin
984.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
Not sure if the original post is satire, but it reads like an alcoholic's submission to https://xkcd.com/1227/
985.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
I have seen exactly one model that charges more for longer contexts: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing Gemini 1M context window That said the cost increase isn't very significant, approximately 2x
986.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
If I tasked you to find a novel hallucination in a leading LLM, how long would it take you? I used to be able to find these and run into them often, but right now I can't generate new failure modes, I just have my list of known failure
987.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
that cost is proportional to how long the cache is held. Currently the cache is not application controlled, it's like CPU caches. If you hit the cache 1ns after it's been held, you get charged the same as if it's held for 5 m
988.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
>This is not true, even if you have the kv cache "hot" in vram. That's just not how transformers work. I'm not strong on how transformers work, but this is something that is verifiable empirically, and has nothing to
989.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
What problem does this solve?
990.
▲
by
TZubiri
9mo ago
>I want to wash MY car >you want to go to the car wash is to help your buddy Joe wash HIS car nope, question is pretty clear, however I will grant that it's only a question that would come up when "testing" the AI rathe
More ›