TZubiri

32 ms·

751.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
The theory would be that the people without information pay for knowledge. Or to hedge against certain events. Similarly to how people would pay premium over inusrance
752.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
As a foreigner, some view making business with the US as shady in of itself. I usually stand by the US legal system, (which even american citizens might find laughable), but this is by far the most likely reason I would distance myself from
753.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
I wrote about this on a Tor thread. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47279518 It looks like Hetzner is Tor (and Tor adjacent) friendly, I suggested this might affect IP reputation, 2 users responded they had no IP reput
754.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
More like iTerm2 is not safe
755.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
There's an actual word-phrase for this exact concept applied more broadly to Defense in general: Arms race
756.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
There's a type of similar trap for devs, not necessarily a passive income trap because most go for a saas and accept the infinite-version release cycle. What some devs usually fall for ( not by watching some youtube video, but by falli
757.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
So kind of like how you would get nowhere by buying more gpus if there's already ASICs in play.
758.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Something tells me that if I look, I'll see a .env being used in the actual tool
759.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
This reminds me of the time a trainee dev was doing some work on a security module to hide the IP of the server. Just spending energy on a non threat.
760.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
I remain skeptical, security is not a notch that you can turn, you can't shove more money or more tokens and make the thing more security. Not saying security will never be dominated by AI like it happened with chess, with maps, with G
761.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
I think the AI thing also transforms functional requirements into technical requirements, often incorrectly. "I want to build a website" gets converted into: "I'm looking for someone with 5+ years of 'hands on'
762.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
oh I got that too, Sent an email, "Open a ticket" . Then I see in the support page that the email opened a ticket and it was marked as solved. For sure their internal metrics are all green and solved tickets are on the rise.
763.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
The thing is that their tight control is precisely what makes whatsapp a spam free environment. You can't have a libre federated protocol AND have it be spam free. As soon as you open up the api floodgate, you'll start to see nige
764.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
You can kind of circumvent that law by keeping the recordings in house. What we have in argentina is an Habeas Data law, if someone has data about you, you can ask for it, (or ask it be amended or deleted. Pretty simple right? The home bit
765.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
I don't get why disclosing is considered acceptable, it seems like racketeering to me, "pay up or else I'll make this hypothetical issue an actual issue for you" When I reported an issue and gotten no response, I sat on
766.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124169 I've noted this in the age verification debate, and in the Android developer verification debate as well. Just denying the tradeoffs isn't productive, if tradeoffs aff
767.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
I think the notion that data would be a home is beyond weak, but the explanation you gave for why isn't solid either, since the objects of data do not need to and in this case haven't consented. That is, recordings of people in pu
768.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Trying to understand the position here. This would be excluding gag orders correct? And regular orders currently notify the service provider, but they don't necessarily notify the target, they just don't have a prohibition on the
769.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
in github's defense. This is a bit more nuanced, less objectively wrong domain posture issue. It will only matter if one security mechanism (subdomain control) fails. The quoted microsoft examples are way worse. I see this with outboun
770.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
github.github.com? Not the first time github does something highly weird with their domains (like publishing docs from a subdomain of their public github pages service) I think they have a culture of circumventing 'official' chann
771.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
they serve like 1B users gratis
772.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Complaining that the joke is ruined, but secretly a way to belong to the in group without actually knowing the joke beforehand
773.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Deranged comment that has only a vague connection to the article topic, but allows me to explore a thought that I had beforehand, poorly formatted and stream-of-consciousnessy because this is not a blog post or even a linkedin article, it&#
774.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
I think this is better than having an account with the last post being from 2019, with no explanation, looking dead, and still being able to receive messages from users.
775.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
It's not like they are separate at all, the owner is very active on the site as both a user and a god-moderator.
776.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Very nice, Twitter/X feels like one of those things we keep doing out of inertia, like using Axios to download in javascript. We used to use it back then because it was a pretty open system, you could famously do analysis on Hashtags,
777.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
That's interesting, here's a perspective from a different type of reader. I tend to read very old books, usually non-fiction, so 'reviews' are usually wikipedia articles, or references by other authors (the more referenc
778.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Maybe the author's response was appropriate and it was you who missed the joke
779.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
It's possible to enjoy amateurish fiction as well right? I think we are a bit spoiled by best sellers and high production movies, but of course those cater to the general public and will have Least Common Denominator themes like check
780.
by TZubiri 7mo ago
Great, let's just hope aayu22809 ( whose github activity started in yesterday, and whose commits are coauthored by claude) doesn't compromise the supply chain of the company.

More ›