TZubiri

28 ms·

631.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
It's their servers sure, but if you download something under a license that doesn't grant you ownership, then it isn't yours. You are being granted a license to use the data.
632.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
How would a donor know this is truly Anna's Archive and not an impostor? The domain and certs seem to change every week. i don't know if you are truly on the righteous side of ethics and law, but you are on the losing side for sur
633.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
maybe if they charge $, then there's a hashcash like PoW deterrent
634.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
isn't 5 tok/s like 100wpm? Pretty standard typing speed. You also would need to compare token generation not with the actual output, but with the thoughts and deleted and edited parts.
635.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
You know that thing where someone is dying and they tell you about these plans they have, and you both know deep down that they are dying, but you let them talk as if they weren't?
636.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
down
637.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Deactivate it, or at least deactivate AI training on copilot. Even if you think you don't use it. If you ever commit something through the GitHub web UI, then GH autogenerates a commit message based on your commit data... so that would
638.
GitHub Source code leaked. Be prepared(twitter.com)
8 points by TZubiri 5mo ago|4 comments
639.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
As you may know, GitHub has detected a breach. This was originated by an employee installing a malicious VSCode extension (and no doubt escalated via other mechanisms.) It transpires that the source code of GitHub has been leaked and is av
640.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
No thank you. I recommend not downloading stuff from a website that cannot hold a Domain for longer than a year and forces you to learn what the 'real domain' is and asks you not to fall for any imposters. If not for legal reasons
641.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
It is a well known phenomenon in haskell or OOP in general that just reading can cause systems to change their execution paths. Which is why it's not sufficient to make write/setters private, but reads/getters too. However in
642.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Before 2026 I hosted client code on GitHub, now it feels suboptimal, code is both an intellectual property asset and security risk. Especially if the company is software based, self-hosting your code just has a much better risk profile for
643.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
It reminds me of the famous "mistakes were made" Nixon quote. "We are investigating unauthorized access" sounds much better than "we've been hacked"
644.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Sorry to be crude, but this sounds either dead on arrival, or at least needing a pivot, or a rephrasing of the pitch: The moment something changes the system, it no longer observes it, in fact observing something might cause it to change (
645.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
I feel that if we build the UI for blind users first, we would get much more powerful systems, rather than building UI for the seeing users and then slapping a CV to text model of what's shown on the screens. Did not test it yet, but b
646.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Quarter century of UNIX sounds interesting. I found at least 1 copy in the Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/aquartercenturyofunixpeterh.salu... The cover looks redacted, as the "Sex, Drugs" from
647.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
If your attack vector is breaking and entering, that's a pretty effective cybersecurity mechanism. But even if it happened, this is one of many additive entropy mechanism, removing or controlling only one source would not be sufficient
648.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
big words, either you are a genius, or it's AI slop and we'd be better off using write(). Don't think there's inbetween.
649.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
California seems to be a leading grounds for online law as well for the technology itself. Lots of clearly needed specific laws. Europe is fine too, but they err on the side of caution and smother actual innovation. Which is interesting bec
650.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
And the part that would make it fraud (in some contexts, especially publicly traded and international corp struturing for tax purposes) would be overvaluing the services.
651.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
There's even arguments for doing this even for cases where the actual state entity did something. "The US did X" The president? The senate? A federal, or municipal body? etc.. But there's arguments against, if "The
652.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
>A clearly AI-generated image didn’t help the credibility (a three-legged crow is quite telling) Actually I checked some sources, and I found some for three-legged crows: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kojiki#The_Naka
653.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
"Enum to string" We've come full circle huh? Why do you need this, logging? In that case I would rather reflect the logging statement to pribt any variable name, or hell, just write out the string. If saving for db, maybe sto
654.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
oh yeah, static has won so much that people are now programming with a language where every possible string forms valid programs.
655.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
Wow, had no idea the thing was so successful. Sovereignity is quite important at a national level. I see that there's also sign products and API products (which can be used to integrate with other aggregator apps), which I personally v
656.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
"postmortem" This is definitely not mortem yet, the worm is spreading downstream
657.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
https://xkcd.com/1357/ I think you are conflating free speech with right to a platform and distribution. Which isn't quite a right, or at least not as constitutional, the former is about not obstructing speech, t
658.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
who would be they in that case? I don't think entities can be charged criminally. A more basic middle ground would be making the company liable for the damages (civil court not criminal).
659.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
Just writing the actual code that you are being paid to write
660.
by TZubiri 6mo ago
Life imitates art https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086082#48087028 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101453

More ›