TZubiri

25 ms·

571.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Sure, but it's not life-critical, lives don't depend on it. Other engineering disciplines have different rules, because for example a bridge or building with a fault might cause the loss of life of hunderds of people.
572.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
One common fallacy of the NIH folk is that reinventing X package would take a lot of time. But first, you will of course not remake every single feature, just the one you need. And furthermore, when you code just one feature, you don't
573.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
There's no magical solution, you just have to use (WAY) less dependencies
574.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Early stage Python backend dev 10+yrs of exp, including going from 0 to 1. Willing to work for equity and chicken nugget money. 0% price-dump subsidized AI codegen 0% npm/pip install Supply chain risk 100% handmade python backend moat
575.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
I think the related news of Meta rolling out subscription models for their free products, is a step in the right direction. Otherwise the only way to provide these services is to massively underfund support, if you charge 0$ per account and
576.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
You said it, instagram is not life-critical
577.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
tbf this is happening with a lot of package managers now, including pypi and composer
578.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
I don't think it was clear in 1994 that not passing the size of a string was a sin
579.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Let's ignore the fact that the LLM did an LPE, and let's assume it did it without malice. It can still get infected and be used as an attack vector by some hidden prompt or some other equally advanced state of the art vuln like &q
580.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
It's time for that EPS to turn into BV baby!
581.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
> Compression (gzip, brotli, zstd): required > cache-control: required It's slop all the way man
582.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Using the least amount of security features is a huge amateur mistake. Best practice is to use 2 redundant layers of security, such that if one fails, there is still another one. Using just the minimum amount of security technically possibl
583.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
It triggers slop flags for me too. 1 - The little color tags : required, optional, recommended. 2 - The insane amount of content no one is ever going to read 3 - the weak premise for an idea carried out to excruciating detail
584.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Might be offtopic, but i think when looking for alternatives the options should be broad, questioning the category of the app, not just clones and forks. If you are considering migrating away from github, don't just consider gitlab and
585.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
I don't know if illegal, but it can be breach of contract, microsoft can say "oopsie, sorry, our bad" or fight it in court. They sold a perpetual product that broke in sync for every user, and the reason it is breaking is bec
586.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
What LI vendors can break https?
587.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Because they used LLMs to do the work. What you are suggesting is to use the LLMs to create more work, which is counter to the shortcut they were trying to take.
588.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
2 caveats: 1st: Even with temp 0 and seed set, you can still get variations, I've heard the explanation relates to batching with other tenants and race conditions in the gpu parallel processing. Also slower int quantized models may red
589.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
>The check is forgotten, optimised away, or never ported. The protocol’s security property silently degrades. This is the bug class bijou64 is designed to make impossible. Not by adding more checks, but by removing the one that mattered
590.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Brb, I need to file an expedited Delaware registration for UnSloppifiers Incorporated real quick.
591.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
>"hey may not have plans to sell this stuff, but whoever acquires them certainly will." If accquirer acquires, it's because seller sold.
592.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Presumably they feel more empowered, like an elephant must feel when a flock of birds are grooming them.
593.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
I read that the host took the trash, which was outside the house, and through the window he saw the cables and the man with the laptop.
594.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
But it isn't worthless because the user is paying for that, and third parties are paying for that as well. Unless the input output is completely different, which it's not because you are human, and I bet you have a profession whic
595.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Wow I thought this was quite obvious, apparently not, so I'll explain. Llm provider sells usage of their model. You use it to write code. Other clients use it to write code as well. If the llm provider trains with user data, then the u
596.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Third parties that can be clients of the AI vendor...
597.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
>Your business data is probably worthless please tell me you are not in charge of the data of any business I'm a client of
598.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
$12,383.50 Which is below the CA 12,500$ limit for small claims court. Haven't checked whether the case was brought to small claims, but that'd be my guess.
599.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Can any lawyer clear this up for me? If the company ends up having no commercial success and the lawsuits for damages rack up, can they just close the company file for bankruptcy and face no consequences? Or is there some civil or criminal
600.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
Counterpoint: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302319 If it ain't broke, don't fix it

More ›