TZubiri

24 ms·

481.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
Good calc, here's some other benefits. herd immunity: Vaccines benefit even those that don't take the vaccine now. eradication effects: vaccines benefit those that don't take the vaccine in the future. fertility increase: non
482.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
I don't know, I definitely wouldn't discount it. My claim is about a specific phenomenon of human behaviour which has acted upon humanity for milenia. Not a specific generation. There's variance and other factors involved, po
483.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
That's a good counterargument Reiterating my claim to focus on how your claim relates to it: "I fear that we have a risk budget, so when STD risk is reduced via a cure or prophylaxis, humans increase the amount of sex they have un
484.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
Granted they also do less alcohol and drugs I hear. But it's still very early in that cohort's life, and there's also going to be other next cohorts. The expected timespan for the benefit of this cure to dissipate would be in
485.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
My bet is that it has to do with the mechanics of receptive vaginal and oral sex, the penis just reaches deeper and causes more lesions. Compared to insertive vaginal sex and oral vaginal performance, those lesions would be less frequent an
486.
Ask HN: Anyone notice World Cup video feeds look like AI?
4 points by TZubiri 4mo ago|2 comments
487.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
I ended up mounting the device as ro. If one wants to recover data from a corrupted device, one should never write anything to it. Any recovery needs to be copied to another device, one should only write a single bit, when one is prepared t
488.
Asked ChatGPT to disable the copy.fail module, it enabled it instead(chatgpt.com)
3 points by TZubiri 4mo ago|0 comments
489.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
490.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
Hacking meme aside, lots of computer scientists are overextending their domain expertise into an area that has been well studied by philosophy and biology. It isn't surprising the software is good and the philosophy looks like outsider
491.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
>doesn't wipe your data Neither does rm, doesn't mean it's not destructive. Especially in the case of disk recovery, where there's already missing file metadata. Destroying even more file metadata can make the data ha
492.
Asked ChatGPT, how to recover data from disk, "run wipefs"(chatgpt.com)
1 points by TZubiri 4mo ago|4 comments
493.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
health check, check that website/webapp returns 4xx and some known keyword api, GET url, content-type aplication/json, parse json you can even invert it and make a server
494.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
Https is almost always terminated separately from the application code.
495.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
You can also use the sockets lib in that case, you depend on POSIX instead of Linux
496.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
>No, you can't write 10 lines of code, you have to import a 100k LOC dependency Common misconception, if you want to replace a dependency on a swiss knife you don't need to implement a swiss knife, sometimes you can just implem
497.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
on the other hand, it might be a benefit that an AI can't spin up instances. Do I want potential to increase expenditure by infinite percent? Or do I want to sign a contract for 2 500$/mo dedicated servers? Let's be real the
498.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
But if you just build bash scripts on top of vms, the talent pool is much larger, necessarily. I feel the motivation goes a bit in the opposite direction. Yes a commoditized worker who speaks a common k8s language, but not too common a lang
499.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
>I think there is a real hole in the market for a simple solution that lets you deploy some containers Containers? In this climate? What's the kernel LPE rate at after copyfail and copyfail2? No containers, VM or harden. No half mea
500.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
But do you have any example of Anthropic products that aim to replace workers?
501.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
>“That’s it,” Moussouris wrote. “‘Fix this code,’ plus several manual steps to generate test scripts, should never have triggered an export control. I feel like making ’90s-style t-shirts with ‘fix this code’ on the front and ‘this shirt
502.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
1. creating and marketing products that are explicitly trying to automate, if not entire professions, at least big parts of them For example? Most of the products they build seem to be tools rather than replacements.
503.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
I always thought of Anthropic to mean antropocentric, like human centered. But is it also a play on Philantropic?
504.
by TZubiri 4mo ago
I thought it would be obvious that paying someone for their services would reduce the odds that they betray you, but it's apparently not so I'll check for some sources. I'd look beyond software as it seems more of a general e
505.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
does npm install pull code from that github repo, though? If not, auditing that repo is a huge blunder. I'm seeing this from npm, which is a bit different: https://www.npmjs.com/package/playcaptcha Not saying the
506.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
>npm install playcaptcha Imagine you get pwned for trying this out in your home project and the APT escalates to your company repos and infects your company assets, and then the post mortem comes in and you have to explain this is what i
507.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
No I don't think so either, nor do I think that my rule is a hard rule, it's more of a correlation: If you pay for software, your supply chain risk is reduced, if you don't pay for software, your risk is increased.
508.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
In neither cases it was really a flaw of wikipedia, the model is clear, contributions should include content and sources, and it's the responsibility of the reader to check the reference. I get it if bullshit is uploaded and a layman i
509.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
the underlying root cause of most supply chain attacks in this era seems to be expecting something of value in exchange of nothing. Under such expectations some will volunteer to give value, but many more will volunteer to give something th
510.
by TZubiri 5mo ago
A technology that is used up to a million times a day is bad, here's the proof, two times it has failed:

More ›