TSiege

6 ms·

61.
by TSiege 4mo ago
If Alphabet can afford it why are they issuing $80B in new shares for fresh capital?
62.
by TSiege 4mo ago
It's hard for me to see this being bigger than the great recession unless there's some vulnerabilities in the banking system we're not aware of. However, the amount of money that's being spent is going to demand a large
63.
by TSiege 4mo ago
> And Google is a major shareholder in SpaceX, so they certainly have incentive to juice the valuation of the IPO. Google own 5-6% of the shares of SpaceX. SpaceX is seeking a valuation of $1.77T which means Google's shares would be
64.
by TSiege 4mo ago
How is spacex not short on money when no one will pay them to use their models and they lose money every quarter? Sure they’re now transitioning to a data center provider away from actually being an AI company because they’re losing less mo
65.
by TSiege 4mo ago
When will the S-1 filings be made public?
66.
by TSiege 4mo ago
most of my coworkers feel the opposite about 4.7 and that 4.6 was, to them, significantly better to point that several stopped using claude code
67.
by TSiege 4mo ago
I really can't tell what is going on with AI these days. I hear AI labs claiming theyre profitable or close to it. I hear companies say they're dubious the juice is worth the squeeze. I've seen anecdotal claims of a measurab
68.
by TSiege 5mo ago
Released a day after the ceasefire falls apart no less
69.
by TSiege 5mo ago
The problem is that people can take loans without financial liability (not how home purchases work) and drive profitable businesses (which are good for the economy) into the ground (bad for the economy and society). No one is worried about
70.
by TSiege 5mo ago
A cosigner is different than what's happening in leveraged buy outs. A Cosigner is financially responsible if the debtor cannot pay back their portion of the loan. In a Leveraged buyout the purchaser does not take on financial liabilit
71.
by TSiege 5mo ago
The difference is that when you buy a home the debt is in your name and you are required to pay it off. In a leveraged buy out wouldn't be to person taking out the loan, the debt is owned by the target of the purchase. If it were like
72.
by TSiege 5mo ago
It is a thorny question. The best way I can square the difference is that generally buying a house with debt is on the debtor and the house itself is collateral. The debtor can't pay back the loan the house is taken by the bank to be s
73.
by TSiege 6mo ago
The sentiment is not that this man shouldn't be prosecuted it is that the blatant double standard and growing endemic societal cancer that is corruption is being allowed to blossom while leaders target scape goats for the same behavior
74.
by TSiege 6mo ago
latency absolutely matters? this is such a weird thing to say. for training sure, but customers absolutely want low latency
75.
by TSiege 6mo ago
Black macbooks are anodized aluminum which are thin coatings that would be removed when filing. It might look cool but it’d be the silvery color of raw aluminum
76.
by TSiege 7mo ago
This looks really interesting. I'm curious to learn more about security around this project. There's a small section, but I wonder if there's more to be aware of like prompt injection
77.
by TSiege 7mo ago
> Pretty much every bill that has ever been put forward for needing an ID to vote has had a provision for free IDs. Do you have a source for this because I have seen very few laws like this and runs counter to the overt intention of thes
78.
by TSiege 7mo ago
Mark Zuckerberg is a joke of a CEO and we should not take him seriously as a leader
79.
by TSiege 7mo ago
more like LLM garbage are rotting search engines from the inside out
80.
by TSiege 7mo ago
Cost is not the first thing I care about in war, but I felt like this is a useful site for tracking the money we're lighting on fire in order to pursue this conflict Civilian costs are real, unjustified, and incalculable.
81.
Iran War Cost Tracker(iran-cost-ticker.com)
324 points by TSiege 7mo ago|446 comments
82.
by TSiege 7mo ago
This makes it make way more sense. That is a huge amount of growth really fast. I've worked in those companies, it's really hard on the work culture and organization when things grow that quickly. I think the potential for product
83.
by TSiege 7mo ago
What else exactly would you expect for a competitor to do when trying to take a rival's market share?
84.
by TSiege 8mo ago
I see your point, but I don't think he's being sarcastic in this paragraph. To me this paragraph isn't sarcasm rather he's presently a serious factual recounting of the logic driving AI evangelists that he then undermine
85.
by TSiege 8mo ago
It is not sarcasm he is fleshing out this sentence earlier in the paragraph, "One of the pervasive new doctrines of Silicon Valley is that we’re in the early stages of a bifurcation event"
86.
by TSiege 8mo ago
OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic all are known to have done this. It's even been exposed in company internal communications. Anthropic already settled their court case. You're an 11 month old account and I suspect you are some sort of
87.
by TSiege 8mo ago
This is a false equivalency if I just share torrented data I can go to prison. These companies downloaded and seeded copy righted material and then sold a product made from that data. If I a civilian did this I would face time in prison. If
88.
by TSiege 8mo ago
I'm really tired of hearing about college students "misbehaving" when with something like this the fish rots from the head. Children learn from the role models we elevate, and look who gets ahead in our society. Full of grift
89.
by TSiege 8mo ago
Fair enough. Call it a high profile acquihire then
90.
by TSiege 8mo ago
There are a few take aways I think the detractors and celebrators here are missing. 1. OpenAI is saying with this statement "You could be multimillion while having AI do all the work for you." This buy out for something vibe coded

More ›