T-A

27 ms·

391.
by T-A 3y ago
https://www.lazarus-ide.org/
392.
by T-A 3y ago
> Either this is a joung enthusiastic coder, which is probably the case From "About Me" [1] I've been writing software since the 70s. The majority of my career was spent creating products in Silicon Valley [1] https:&#
393.
AMD Ryzen AI Software(amd.com)
1 points by T-A 3y ago|0 comments
394.
by T-A 3y ago
https://quantum.lassp.cornell.edu/lecture/coupled_harmonic_o...
395.
AI and the Bomb: Nuclear Strategy and Risk in the Digital Age(armscontrol.org)
1 points by T-A 3y ago|0 comments
396.
Large Language Model Course(github.com)
178 points by T-A 3y ago|10 comments
397.
by T-A 3y ago
That reminds me... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14476421
398.
by T-A 3y ago
> There is no legitimate threat from Russia to Nato within the next 6 years Roark66 said "next ~6 years tops", so you two do not really disagree; the question is what comes after those six years. The number is presumably taken
399.
by T-A 3y ago
Russia already did that: https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/lancet-russia-targetting/
400.
Real-time improvisational interaction between computer and musician [video](youtube.com)
3 points by T-A 3y ago|0 comments
401.
by T-A 3y ago
This booster, designated with the serial number B1058, has now flown 18 times https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/11/a-historic-falcon-9-is...
402.
by T-A 3y ago
By way of [1], here [2] is a paper about A* also posted under CS/AI. It introduces "Q* search, a search algorithm that uses deep Q-networks to guide search" and uses it "to solve the Rubik's cube", the thing w
403.
by T-A 3y ago
I guess "What Have the Romans Ever Done for Us?" [1] never gets old. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc7HmhrgTuQ
404.
Cyberattack – November 2023(blender.org)
1 points by T-A 3y ago|0 comments
405.
Global AI Conference – 12 December 2023 – Global AI Community(globalai.community)
1 points by T-A 3y ago|0 comments
406.
by T-A 3y ago
> what the heck is Larry Summers doing on that board? The former president of a research-oriented nonprofit (Harvard U) controlling a revenue-generating entity (Harvard Management Co) worth tens of billions, ousted for harboring views c
407.
by T-A 3y ago
...and quantized ones from the usual suspect: https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Orca-2-7B-GGUF https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Orca-2-13B-GGUF The 7B Q5_K_M one is small enough to run on an 8GB cons
408.
by T-A 3y ago
The scenario usually bandied about is AGI self-improving at an accelerating rate: once you cross the threshold to self-improvement, you quickly get superintelligence with God-like powers beyond human comprehension (a.k.a. the Singularity) a
409.
by T-A 3y ago
It could be the era when you strike it big with your new T-shirt business, propelled to fame by an instantly classic design featuring the words "One giant leap for mankind" over a soaring Starship, followed by the inevitable &quot
410.
by T-A 3y ago
> I wish we had the spirit of the Apollo Careful what you wish for. The Saturn test program peaked at 3 tests / year (unless you want to count the separately tested launch escape system for the crew capsule), and the fully stacked S
411.
by T-A 3y ago
> CTO should be technical people What about CEOs? > She should understand every layer of the cake, and by the interview I can take that's not the case I just read it, and I can't imagine how you can make such an inference fr
412.
by T-A 3y ago
https://www.science.org/content/article/models-galaxies-atom... https://towardsdatascience.com/physics-informed-neural-netwo... https://maziarraissi.github.io/PINNs/ https:&
413.
by T-A 3y ago
> The X-37B operates in GEO So far it hasn't. Out of the six missions so far [1], the highest one only reached altitude 404 km [2]: [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37#Operational_histor... [2] https
414.
by T-A 3y ago
Thanks, fixed. I meant Falcon Heavy. And it's actually a little more than that to GTO , but then the thing has to get itself into GEO, so it's not all payload: Falcon Heavy has the second highest lift capability of any operation
415.
by T-A 3y ago
Who says they are lying about it? From the article: So far, Space Force has only stated that the mission will "expand the United States Space Force's knowledge of the space environment by experimenting with future space domain aw
416.
by T-A 3y ago
The boring answer would be that it's just sharing the ride with a bunch of other satellites, as it did on the last three occasions. The fun answer would be that it's going way further than ever before. A Falcon Heavy can take 25
417.
by T-A 3y ago
Let's quote the whole sentence, shall we? An LCM demands merely 32 A100 GPUs Hours training for 2-step inference, as de- picted in Figure 1. [1] Now let's look at the caption under Figure 1: LCMs can be distilled from any pre-t
418.
by T-A 3y ago
> They mean devices that you aren't intelligent enough to understand. They don't even define what they mean by "device", nor do they try to explain why regulatory bodies would allow something nobody understands into t
419.
by T-A 3y ago
The scenario referred to in the title, "financial devices that only AI can understand, that no human being can understand", seems rather silly. If by "devices" he means automated trading systems, those have been around
420.
by T-A 3y ago
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/473/877/421...

More ›