Sunhold

11 ms·

31.
by Sunhold 3y ago
The taxi industry is a famous example of regulatory capture and its harms.
32.
by Sunhold 3y ago
The translations in this article use GPT-3 (the free version), not GPT-4 (ChatGPT Pro). You can tell by the green logo.
33.
by Sunhold 3y ago
Took me a bit to realize this comment was written by an LLM.
34.
by Sunhold 3y ago
Learning to draw at the level of what Stable Diffusion can generate would take thousands of hours of practice, and the individual drawings would take hours.
35.
by Sunhold 3y ago
Not really. A team of licensed health care professional rated "the quality of information provided".
36.
by Sunhold 3y ago
Why do you think it matters if five out of six images are failures? If the sixth is a success, you have your image. The tool has worked. Glancing over a few failed generations is certainly far less effort than making the image from scratch
37.
by Sunhold 3y ago
Product 1 never reached the market. Product 2 and 3 are very different.
38.
by Sunhold 3y ago
Unless you actually checked the article, ChatGPT likely hallucinated the figures and picked a plausible-sounding source. Most likely, nothing changed when you tried a few days later. The responses are stochastic due to the temperature setti
39.
by Sunhold 4y ago
I'm a translator, and that might be true for Google Translate, but not GPT-4. GPT-4 produces translations that are generally accurate, and when instructed to copyedit its own work, well-written. In most cases, all I need to do is fix t
40.
by Sunhold 4y ago
GPT 4 was evaluated on multiple reasoning benchmarks in the release paper.[1] The problems in TPTP are not really appropriate for a language model and exceed the capabilities of most humans working without tools. Clearly humans have some re
41.
by Sunhold 4y ago
This article repeats the rumor that GPT4 has 100 trillion parameters, which Sam Altman has called "complete bullshit."[1] [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebjkD1Om4uw
42.
by Sunhold 4y ago
I'm impressed by the talking dog because it's a dog that can talk, not because I think it's a great orator.
43.
by Sunhold 4y ago
That appears to show that it can't answer some obscure trivia question to the standards of the blog post author. Nothing to do with generalizing concepts.
44.
by Sunhold 4y ago
This kind of stuff clearly shows that GPT can generalize concepts: https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1626084142239649792
45.
by Sunhold 4y ago
It didn't. The article is nonsense. He probably primed it beforehand by talking about Sudoku, or it may have just chanced onto something similar. When I ask it to code Sumplete, it creates a "math-based game in which players have
46.
by Sunhold 4y ago
There is no evidence at all that it copied the smartphone game. No one has even been able to show a textual description of its rules online that could be copied. And modifying the rules of Sudoko to create a variation is well within ChatGPT
47.
by Sunhold 4y ago
Did you try? It replies "I'm sorry, but I don't recognize the language or the words you've written. Could you please provide more context or information about the language or the origin of these words? That would help me
48.
by Sunhold 4y ago
If it ends early, just ask it to continue. If there is something wrong with the code, ask it to fix it.
49.
by Sunhold 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect
50.
by Sunhold 4y ago
This is like complaining that your computer isn't able to toast bread. It's a language model based on multicharacter tokens, outputting grids of single characters is not something you would expect it to succeed at. If you explaine