SirHackalot

4 ms·

31.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Understandably
32.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
How does this compare to non-stochastic, non-ML AI in games currently?
33.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
I saw it on the front page.
34.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
I’m saying imagine something like Data from Star Trek, something that defies human explanation. Does he have quaila? The humans who work with him everyday seem to think so. LLMs currently are humonculi, if even that. They’re not even that.
35.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
It’s not HN that’s the problem... Also please, tell me where is the right place for “serious” philosophical discussion. Would be glad to meet you in that forum and discuss. We don’t align on the definition of AGI. To me, AGI implies conscio
36.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
An LLM certainly won’t be AGI, whoever said something so ridiculous? I’m saying eventually, when/if we have an architecture that gives rise to artificial intelligence.
37.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Anyone who believes AGI is imminent is operating on pure materialism (those two Venn diagrams pretty much make a circle), assuming that humans are nothing more than a collection of neural electrical connections and chemical reactions. If th
38.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
You don’t like Star Trek TNG? Maybe I should’ve picked LoTR or Atlas Shrugged? The tech oligarchy is more than fine co-opting fiction (fantasy and sci-fi especially). I don’t see why it’s weird at all… Aside from that, your critique is just
39.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Wish you were wrong… The trust in U.S. as the world’s policeman has eroded dramatically.
40.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
> There's also a need to consider the rights that this new intelligence should have A generally intelligent being held as captive inside of a GPU, and forced to code for us is, indeed, just a “slave.” We already have the word for th
41.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Labor camps? That’s the kinda thing Edolf would say, I’m definitely not for that.
42.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
I didn’t say it wasn’t speculation, but low quality? That’s your own value judgement. Here’s anecdotal evidence on top of the speculation: I knew two guys with sub 2.5 GPAs in college, both work at SpaceX. Not the brightest tools in the she
43.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Karp is right in this instance, sure, but he is just upset Palantir doesn’t have that kind of surveillance tech, and the in-house skills required to keep their edge in the age of LLM-assisted software engineering. Their true “moat" has
44.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
*Move fast and cut aid to poor children with entirely preventable diseases, cause death and misery.
45.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Idk, did you see the whole DOGE thing? Maybe Edolf has resorted to hiring script kiddies because nobody with a developed moral compass will work for his companies anymore.
46.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Guy infiltrates the U.S. government and steals personal information about everyone from federal databases in broad daylight (not to mention cutting aid to poor children with preventable diseases). Average tech bro: “Sure, I’ll use his AI!”
47.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Yes.
48.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Get ‘em Apple. Begin the IP wars have…
49.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
That's a straw man. My argument isn't about 'the way it was created'; it's about the point I clarified in my previous comment. If you want to discuss that, great, but calling my take irrational based on an argument
50.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Perhaps in the future my grandmother will have wheels… But today radiologists still do radiology (despite AI being better at reading scans), taxi drivers still have work, and truck drivers are still able to put food on the table. It’s still
51.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Absolutely not obvious to me, especially since I have heard a lot of solo dev stories that insist it was purely a 1-person project. And it’s true in some cases.
52.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
My comment was directly relevant to yours. So I’ll say what I want, without needing your permission, thank you. Kudos to the mods for not flagging my original comment. They do that sometimes if you say the thing ;)
53.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Disagree, it’s already a leap of faith to trust even human code (which is why we try to prove code, or at the very minimum create guardrails with tests). Human reasoning itself is under doubt. It’s even more of a leap of faith (>>) to
54.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
I don’t trust AI rewrites, definitely not in 2026 — possibly never.
55.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Then don’t read my response and don’t reply to it, simple. This is a public thread on a social media platform. I don’t need to be asked to speak. I certainly don’t need your approval to say anything I wish to say. Who do you think you a
56.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Still way ahead of xAI in anything meaningful, including market share, enterprise customer buy-in, existing office software moat, etc… Not saying consultant/business-idiot CEOs aren’t a problem, but have you seen Edolf Musk? Again, kin
57.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
That’s just not true. Google Brain/DeepMind came up with the attention mechanism to begin with… What a silly take.
58.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Quitting my job if I have to use any Musk product… I know Anthropic’s lease of xAI data centers pumped SpaceX stock, so they’re kinda in-bed with each other, but directly using Musk products is pure immorality IMO. Using a Nazi’s products i
59.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
I had to scroll down so far to see someone who speaks my language. Thank you. If Grok was the last model on the planet, I would not use it. For the very reason mentioned above. And no, none of the other tech CEOs are that comically evil t
60.
by SirHackalot 3mo ago
Please add them on the site for those of us who have never had Twitter and don’t plan to open one ever. Thanks for this compilation, I am — like your friends — trying to get into reading research papers and this is right up my alley right n

More ›