SinParadise

8 ms·

61.
by SinParadise 5y ago
You are a good man.
62.
by SinParadise 5y ago
Amazing app, glad to see the pivot. It is a great fit.
63.
by SinParadise 5y ago
In exchange, he get a different piece of paper, possibly framed and maybe a pat on the back for a job well done. Sounds fair to me.
64.
by SinParadise 5y ago
This puts into words why I hate subclass based frameworks and get footgunned by some convention-over-configuration frameworks. My preference would be function based, interface based and annotation based, in that order.
65.
by SinParadise 5y ago
The article in video form: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNwukfhsOME
66.
by SinParadise 5y ago
> 2. What that's going to do to ecosystems is largely unknown This is true, but is also a bit of a red herring. All hierarchical organizations from the individual to the country is optimized to the environmental condition they are s
67.
by SinParadise 5y ago
That's quite the "long story short". You went from a love of ML and Haskell to not recommending it in the second paragraph. Please elaborate because that is quite the leap.
68.
by SinParadise 5y ago
I think this is true for most programming languages. I want more stylistic, opinionated stuff that comes with contexts and caveats, so I can get to understand their decision making process and avoid footguns that can only be learned through
69.
by SinParadise 5y ago
>The incentive goes away if you don't sell on Amazon, right? Any Amazon "strangle" (your word, not mine) only exists because people choose to sell on Amazon, right? And you can exit any monopoly of some industry by exiting
70.
by SinParadise 5y ago
The limitation of print incentivizes me to write smaller functions and code that are generally free of mutations, so traces doesn't get stale fast. Debugging on the otherhand, well.. I've just been told by my senior to write bigge