Seenso

46 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by Seenso 7y ago

   > As far as full military, sure. But their rudimentary guided srbm's are not the best by any measure. Their best still use infrared or standard gps for guidance. That is early 90s tech by american standards. > Edit: wiki shows ev
2. 182.▲
   by Seenso 7y ago

   > I'd like to learn how Boeing's software delivery practice has changed. Sounds like there may be some lessons learned we can all learn from. Does Boeing build its own cockpit displays and avionics? I was under the impression
3. 183.▲
   by Seenso 7y ago

   Wow. Isn't this a massive retreat on their part, which negates a lot of the business justification for the MAX? If they're going to require MAX-specific simulator training, could they just rip out MCAS and be done with it?
4. 184.▲
   by Seenso 7y ago

   My guess is it's some kind private survey relating to oil/gas or agriculture.
5. 185.▲
   by Seenso 7y ago

   That's interesting, but wouldn't it make more sense to have a compatibility system that would allow Linux drivers to be used? Apparently there's one for Windows drivers: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.c
6. 186.▲
   by Seenso 7y ago

   >> But what's the difference between a government setting the rules and a corporation deciding the rules? We can vote out a government, but we can't vote out a corporation. > You as an individual can stop using a corporat