Sebb767

31 ms·

331.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Assuming the US. In Germany, anything below 45ct/kWh [0] is considered cheap right now. [0] Euro-cent, but the conversion is pretty much 1:1 right now anyway.
332.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> and I don't have a computer that's ancient enough to really notice resource hogging. Most likely you don't use a conference software bad enough. That being said, having useful search, a quick UI and actual availability s
333.
by Sebb767 4y ago
It's not that the human connection is immoral, it's just that paying rent and heating for a pretty empty office space doesn't make much sense. As long as there is sufficient space for all the employees that want to go to the
334.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> Relearning the same lessons that have been relearnt and forgotten ten thousand times before me. I don't think they are forgotten, you just changed. If I think back to being a child, going to a restaurant and just sit there and tal
335.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Most importantly: HN is moderated by payed moderators, which are hired and selected to do a good job here. They are still humans and fallible, obviously, but it's a far cry from "random dude that started a community in his free
336.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> if brute force didn't work, it just wasn't brute enough Arguably, upgrading to explosives counts as 'more brute'
337.
by Sebb767 4y ago
I think you missed the reference here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Luftballons
338.
by Sebb767 4y ago
But Hawking was far from poor and Jake Paul might not be as smart as Hawking, but he's a marketing genius. It's just a classic case of the tails coming apart [0]. Financial success and intelligence are definitely related and far f
339.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> Should the penalty for upsetting a judge be life minus the 10 years you were already looking at? By that logic, if you're looking at life and upset the judge, you should be let go? > This just tells me the justice system is fuc
340.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> People get ruled mentally unfit to stand trial because they can't string sentences together or have the sort of verifiable mental health condition that'll see them institutionalised anyway, not because they're running ro
341.
by Sebb767 4y ago
I might take you up on that offer :) How can one contact you?
342.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Except it's 10$ and shipped in three days - unless you pay 16$ and get it tomorrow, which is unfortunately not when you need that monitor to work. Even then, it's most likely even more expensive, because if it's just an off-t
343.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Probably depends on your heater setup. My parents have a flow-activated central heating system in the basement and waiting for warm water can take over a minute. In my current apartment, I have an electric heater basically next to the showe
344.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> There's no reason why a package-management system needs to be language-specific; dependencies are often cross-language. Hell, even some blocks of code contain more than one language. This sounds a lot like a case of https:/&
345.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> it is actually possible to write highly-reusable code that is clean, understandable, and not "over-engineered" You might be able to do that. That code (most likely) still needs to solve a complex issue and needs documentation
346.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Well, in the current stream of layoff announcements you have to be special to get that bad^Wfree press!
347.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> it however will be baked into almost every search engine and allow an "alternative" way to search the web, where you get answers to simple questions right away without having to go to a website. That's what Google does q
348.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Google hasn't been a trendsetter for a few years now, either (unless you count enforcing web standards with Chrome). Also, calling "relevant industry giant making heaps of money" a failure scenario is quite a stretch.
349.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> While it's true that they are late in getting something like ChatGPT to market Are they? ChatGPT is by all means a loss leader; I don't see why Google would need a halo AI product right now.
350.
by Sebb767 4y ago
I think this is also a bit of a miscommunication. If you take "blogging is dead" as "[literally] nobody blogs anymore", it's clearly wrong, no discussion. Instead, if you take it as "blogging is no longer hyped
351.
by Sebb767 4y ago
The thing isn't that you don't have a number of problematic employees, as you correctly pointed out you most likely have them in any sufficiently large organization. The problem is that you can't find a static number for them
352.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Then add ArgoCD for deployment and istio for a service mesh! While you are at it, also setup Longhorn for storage. With that solved, you might as well start hosting Gitea and DroneCI on the cluster, plus an extra helm- and docker repo for g
353.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Related joke: Any program has a least one bug and can be made shorter by at least one line. So any program can be reduced to a single line that doesn't work. Stack ranking seems to bring in the assumption that any company can be reduce
354.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> You will realize that running a business is extremely hard and a bunch of antagonistic employees are unhelpful No one [0] denies this. The problem with stack ranking is that you are forced to find problematic employees even when there
355.
by Sebb767 4y ago
To be fair, by now Netflix is rotating a lot, too. By now I'm surprised if a movie or series I'm recommended actually is on Netflix. It's not on Amazon Prime level yet, but it's not that far off, at least in my experienc
356.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> It is! So many people (both potential large customers and that long tail of small customers) will not click "contact a sales associate" and just leave when you won't say how much a thing costs. Yes! Especially since &#x2
357.
by Sebb767 4y ago
If anything, it's actually a faulty generalization: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization
358.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> at least thats how it works for the rest of us. Is that true? If you make your SF salary of >$200k and manage to down production, are you sent a bill for lost revenue? I don't think so. In fact, since CEOs are (usually) mostly
359.
by Sebb767 4y ago
> The baseline for ordinary people is not to be in the position of power or not to have a high salary. This is quite funny, since the 'victims' we're talking about are some of the highest paid people in an already highly p
360.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Also, it clearly states there are layoffs! Anyone skipping over corporate jargon could have easily missed the single line with "btw, we'll lay off 10k people" in Satyas mail.

More ›