Sean-Der

9 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   I thought about your comment a lot. I worry that most people just say nice things (but think the opposite) so I appreciate you being direct. ----- I don't expect you to know anything about me. It made me feel like you have written me o
2. 152.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   Can you describe more? I would love to build/try it!
3. 153.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   I was interested in the ‘hands-free’ idea. If I put these devices through out my house it would allow me to switch AI personalities by proximity. You can also use the device without your phone. These devices are also very cheap. I think you
4. 154.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   This project isn’t tightly coupled with anything. Any service that supports WebRTC should work! Also I was hoping to push people toward a RTOS. Better experience then a raspberry pi, I can cycle power and be back way quicker. Also cheaper&#
5. 155.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/thorwebdev_esp32-webrtc-activ... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HbO18Elw9WY Are two that I know of. Try it out, if you hit any roadblocks @ me on pipecat discord and would
6. 156.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   https://www.daily.co/ You can use it to build lots of different real-time communication projects. Conferencing, Send your audio/video to GPU servers for AI, broadcasting and lots more. It’s a super fun space to be in
7. 157.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   No sound! YouTube video in README does. I was tempted to put Erik Satie in the README video. Didn’t want to risk copyright issues
8. 158.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   This is just a hackathon project. Not a product in any way. My primary work is on backend WebRTC servers. This was just an outlet/fun side thing to do client and embedded work. I love writing C and do microcontrollers. I just can’t see
9. 159.▲
   by Sean-Der 1y ago

   I also have been working with Daily on https://github.com/pipecat-ai/pipecat-esp32 I see so much potential if I can make hardware hacking + WebRTC easy. Not just for AI assistants but security cameras + robotics. If an
10. 160.▲
    Show HN: OpenAI/reflect – Physical AI Assistant that illuminates your life(github.com)

    92 points by Sean-Der 1y ago|52 comments
11. 161.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    What failed about ChatGPT Voice? I work on it and would love to see it fixed/make sure you haven't hit a bug I don't know about!
12. 162.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Have you tried https://github.com/m1k1o/neko yet?
13. 163.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    In this release I landed pacing for WebRTC. Before it could lose packets around keyframes (from bursty UDP). You can see the code for it here https://github.com/paullouisageneau/libdatachannel/blob/mast... If
14. 164.▲
    OBS Studio 31.1.1 Released(github.com)

    3 points by Sean-Der 1y ago|1 comments
15. 165.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    I put up a video here [0] so you can see it in action. All the software is coming together to make some really cool things possible. * Pipecat lets you switch between different AI backends with just a little code * Espressif is so easy to h
16. 166.▲
    Show HN: Open-Source Quarter Sized AI Voice Assistant (ESP32-Pipecat)(github.com)

    5 points by Sean-Der 1y ago|1 comments
17. 167.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Nice work! I saw the same quality improvement switching from from VNC -> WebRTC. Thanks for publicizing you used neko. I am sure it means a lot to the authors :)
18. 168.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    I really love what you have built here. The future of video streaming I want to see is sending video to a small group of friends. It is a more connected/social future. I love what you have done with utsuru. Would you be up for sending
19. 169.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Depends on your needs! https://github.com/pion/webrtc/tree/master/examples/save-to-... here is an example of a server that does what you need on the backend
20. 170.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    I saw this also. WebRTC just is the path of least resistance/highest adoption at this point. We could go make a better/simpler standard for video streaming that is TCP. What a giant battle though that would never seen adoption . I
21. 171.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Broadcast Box has a discord https://discord.gg/An5jjhNUE3 You could also join the Pion one https://pion.ly/discord Other place is video-dev Slack https://www.video-dev.org/ X also has a gre
22. 172.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Twitch supports WHIP today. Lots of WebRTC services support WHIP (Cloudflare, LiveKit, Dolby...) webrtcHacks has an article on it[0] kind of old, but captures the spirit of it! [0] https://webrtchacks.com/tag/simulcast&
23. 173.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Absolutely! Some people have modified libwebrtc to do this today, but it wasn't upstreamed. ICE (protocol for networking) supports this today. It just needs to get into the software.
24. 174.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    With WebRTC you can expect ~100ms with zero optimizations on your LAN. With bitwhip[0] I got it way lower then that even. [0] https://github.com/bitwhip/bitwhip
25. 175.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Thank you :) When are you coming back to the WebRTC space, lots more cool stuff you could b doing :) I really loved [0] it's so cool that a user can access a server behind a firewall/NAT without setting up a VPN or having SSH cons
26. 176.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Yes we are :) When OBS merges the PR [0] things are going to get very interesting. Before you needed to run expensive transcoding jobs to be able to support heterogenous clients. Once we get Simulcast the only cost will be bandwidth. With H
27. 177.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Those are issues in multiple implementations though! Lots of them are just issues in Chromium around Javascript (webrtc code wasn't even started yet) That would be like saying saying 'webrtc is more secure then http' by posti
28. 178.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    Currently only the sending part! WHIP is 'pushing media via WebRTC' - https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-wish-whip-01.html WHEP is 'pulling media via WebRTC' - https://github
29. 179.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    How would you like to see/use the SCTP parts? I am not sure how to expose them since the WHIP IETF draft makes no mention/suggestion of it. Most 'WHIP Providers' also support DataChannel. But it isn't a standardized
30. 180.▲
    by Sean-Der 1y ago

    What security flaws? This implementation is very small. I feel 100% confident we are giving users the best thing possible.