Scarbutt

53 ms·

301.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Typical scam website.
302.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
For those that have switched to Go from nodejs to serve json for a web app, how did it go? (excluding the possibility of needing something like react ssr which can be a big one for many apps).
303.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
For you requirements, you can't wrong with postgres, nodejs and react. Why juggle between two languages when you can just use one?
304.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
4. Concurrency model that lets you spin up things in the background and keep processing in memory before you go into databases, worker queues, and whatnot. If you want to cache something slow, just put it in a map behind an RWMutex, and yo
305.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Check out https://www.hugsql.org/ . Is a Clojure library but I'm sure I have seen Python and JS versions around.
306.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
More like Google, Mozilla just waits to see if Google is going to implement it since they can't think for themselves.
307.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Besides performance, what other cons exists for immutable data structures in a single standalone system?
308.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Mozilla should switch to chromium.
309.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Performance was not his only pain point. He also had issues integrating with the JS ecosystem. IMO Clojurescript is not worth extra layer of complexity.
310.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Yes, Lisp and F# are esoteric programming languages in the industry.
311.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Esoteric is the word I would use.
312.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Hardly a game changer
313.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Yep, the author learnt their lesson. I bet they won't be using cljs again, not even for non-performant apps.
314.
From ClojureScript to JavaScript&rust; 4x smaller, 50x faster(blog.asciinema.org)
24 points by Scarbutt 5y ago|1 comments
315.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
FWIW, I use emacs exclusively inside tmux, starts in ~0.3ms for me with more than 40 external packages.
316.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
If you are writing toy programs in your mom's basement sure but every real world clojure project I have work with had to use Java libraries. When I said 'not writing Java' I was obviously talking about the JVM.
317.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Not writing Java (although you do have to do lots of interop with Java).
318.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
It's a shame that something like Typescript is and will dominate the static typing JS ecosystem/industry instead of something simpler and sane like Rescript.
319.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Don't know the exact details but they mentioned is full of operational footguns, like using it slightly wrong can utterly tank your performance or availability. Many operations are unpredictable so is hard to know what to expect. Anoth
320.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
This forum is heavily anti-other-dbs and pro-postgres so you won't get objective answers here. FWIW, at least three DBAs that know both well have told me that postgres is an operational nightmare compared to mysql.
321.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
hmmm they are fucked, such a horrible UX compared to vscode remote development.
322.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Just one, esbuild for JSX and bundling.
323.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
dramatically reducing the number of bugs you write. I would say that's a big overstatement.
324.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Honestly typeorm and nestjs are pretty bad.
325.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
When trying these cloud providers I always come back to AWS, the AWS network is so good.
326.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
It's not full stack until there is a real database offer ;)
327.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
ThanosJS ;)
328.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Handling of state. Reusability, extendability, flexibility, immutability, avoiding brittleness and coupling. The things Typescript gives you are very physically visible and so, gives the illusion and confidence it will guard you in everythi
329.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Sad but true.
330.
by Scarbutt 5y ago
Not if you already know JS and something like Ocaml or Haskell

More ›