Sauer_Kraut

9 ms·

31.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
Was the person under NDA? Forbidden from filming beforehand? The most of you seem to be leaping to the defense of the CEO for something that could've been a personal action based on a perceived slight instead of a corporate policy. Out
32.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
My definition of force involves things like threats of violence, firearms. FORCE. People's definition of force here on HN seems to be "A written request by the USG."
33.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
Google is singled out due to the humans behind the corporate facade complying, no one forced them to. I would hate to reduce it to binary but things like installation of proxy hardware (Blue Coat[1]) to monitor with or court orders for cons
34.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
This is a horrific attitude.
35.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
I believe encryption is a very reasonable goal, but if anything the fact that encryption including stenography is highly detectable and is now known as reasons for suspicion and analysis, I do not agree with it being "the only recourse
36.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
This is absolutely wrong. Encryption is now a means of making yourself a suspect. Referencing or communicating with suspects is means to make yourself a suspect. There is no technical solution away from this. edit: What, no rebuttal? No elo
37.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
For employee numbers, not contracts. If anything it stands there will be a higher concentration of work and monies given to the immune likes of Booz Allen Hamilton.
38.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
What indicates they will be cut off?
39.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
Those second set of eyes, always judging(helping) and meddling(contributing). Damn(bless) them.
40.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
Since Edward Snowden was considered an administrator and he was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton, this means a supposed large cut in contracts to external legally immune corporations. First off I doubt much of a cut on spending or a hindranc
41.
by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago
From the monolithic US government: "Defendant Barrett Lancaster Brown moved to continue trial and pretrial deadlines on July 31, 2013 explaining that more time is required in order to adequately prepare his defense in light of the ongo
42.
US Tries Gag Order On Barrett Brown, Brown Cites Micheal Hastings During Defense(cryptome.org)
5 points by Sauer_Kraut 13y ago|2 comments