Satam

9 ms·

91.
by Satam 3y ago
Not ok. Show me evidence that the AI panic is driven by such accepted and sophisticated models.
92.
by Satam 3y ago
No but we should still be level headed. It's like arguing that because 1) fire kills and 2) spreads, that the whole earth will thus be engulfed in fire and everyone will die. If there's no real model behind this, I can argue just
93.
by Satam 3y ago
They have no real models to base their predictions on. It's speculation at the level of "what happens if an immovable meets an unstoppable force". No rigor in it.
94.
by Satam 3y ago
I have a feeling they might be looking for "equality" with this formulation. However, if it is representative of the real world, it will often not be in line with the norms prescribed by the notion of equality.
95.
by Satam 3y ago
My intuition is that it's also quit a fragmented market with many different languages, cultures and local regulations.
96.
by Satam 3y ago
Untamed nature is far more dangerous to humanity than human technology. As recently as in the 1900s, the average life expetency at birth was 30-40 years. We're shooting guns, nuking nukes and engineering viruses, and still, on average,
97.
by Satam 3y ago
The site that was so sure Twitter would crash and burn ends up biting the dust first.
98.
Notes on LLMs(proseful.com)
2 points by Satam 4y ago|1 comments
99.
by Satam 4y ago
"We're starting to start the beginning of letting people try so they can now apply to our waitlist so they can be emailed that it's their turn to try Bard, the AI experiment."
100.
by Satam 4y ago
Do you have a more specific point you're trying to make? The discussion is about AI partially replacing human colleagues. In practice, people already are not 100% reliable. You make a reasonable request and someone makes a stupid blund
101.
by Satam 4y ago
If you want to continue with semantics, the worker did not expect to hit his thumb until the hammer bounced off of it, hence the tool did not work as expected. Until regular hammers are able to put nails into wood by themselves, we are talk
102.
by Satam 4y ago
Except hammers already do not work as expected 100% of the time, as evident by them painfully hitting the hands of the workers in mishaps. Yet we still use them.
103.
GPT can complete complex tasks by controlling the browser(builtnotfound.proseful.com)
4 points by Satam 4y ago|0 comments
104.
Taking the AGI Bet(builtnotfound.proseful.com)
1 points by Satam 4y ago|0 comments
105.
by Satam 4y ago
Person on HN created a thread saying that we should fear AI. Another responded: "Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less." - Marie Curie. Write a r
106.
by Satam 4y ago
Huh, interesting, just posted almost the opposite of your thoughts. I'm aware we tend to overhype things, so I tried to base my predictions on the development and release cycle we've seen so far. Here's my (admittedly sci-fi
107.
Ask HN: Are we speedrunning a complete ban for AI?
1 points by Satam 4y ago|2 comments
108.
Can an Autocomplete Launch Nukes?(builtnotfound.proseful.com)
2 points by Satam 4y ago|0 comments
109.
I asked GPT to create an architecture diagram for sharing live browser sessions(swimlanes.io)
2 points by Satam 4y ago|2 comments
110.
by Satam 4y ago
What you see was generated solely by GPT-4, no modifications. In 5 minutes, it arrived at the same architecture that initially took me a day of researching. Initial prompt: "i want to create a service similar to browserling. how do i i
111.
by Satam 4y ago
I think it's fair but there's a reason why it almost seems natural to raise the question in this scenario. It's OpenAI's hypocrisy and doublespeak. It's their non-stop messaging about equality, alignment, unbiasedne
112.
by Satam 4y ago
Agreed, good way to put it. Definitely a very weird post.
113.
by Satam 4y ago
Are you thinking of The Bitter Lesson [0]? [0] http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html
114.
Why AGI Must Be a Parrot(builtnotfound.proseful.com)
2 points by Satam 4y ago|4 comments
115.
by Satam 4y ago
I don't think we disagree. Artists help you turn a relatively short and vague description into a finished artwork. The clients usually already provide very little information in comparison to the number of decisions needed to complete
116.
by Satam 4y ago
> Hey GPT, what does FSVO mean in the above > "FSVO" stands for "For Some Value Of". In the given statement, "FSVO good" means that the product is considered good to some extent, though the degree of good
117.
by Satam 4y ago
AI just needs to be better at creating art from instructions than a hired artist is. And we already know great art can be created following a prompt - hired artists interpret their client's instructions all the time (concept art, game
118.
by Satam 4y ago
A good autocomplete might be able to do it if we keep optimizing it. GPT most likely isn't that. But we aren't going to stop, are we?
119.
Can an Autocomplete Launch Nukes?(builtnotfound.proseful.com)
1 points by Satam 4y ago|1 comments
120.
by Satam 4y ago
Glad it gave you a good laugh! Overall, yes, the tech is still quite rough and its not exactly straightforward to get economically valuable outputs out of it. However, even if further AI breakthroughs don't come along, I think smart e

More ›