Sanzig

6 ms·

31.
by Sanzig 3mo ago
The tweet was fine - it was directly addressing Corgi's claim that they had "vibe coded" DataRoom when they had copied and pasted it from Papermark. The problem is the OP chose to perform a contextectomy on the tweet and make
32.
by Sanzig 3mo ago
Yeah, the title that the OP chose is so sufficiently misleading that I think this one will need to be get changed by the mods. Seitz isn't opining on the ethics of vibe coding in his tweet, he's pointing out that Corgi literally
33.
by Sanzig 3mo ago
Same issue in Canada - domestic inference capability for the open models is woefully behind.
34.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
There's a blanket statement at the bottom of the pricing page, which I would hope also applies to GLM-5.2: > Where are models hosted? > Ollama hosts models and compute resources primarily in the United States. To serve global dem
35.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
Take a look at Ollama Cloud: https://ollama.com/pricing You get access to a whole bunch of bleeding edge open models including GLM-5.2, Kimi K2.7, DeepSeek 4 Pro, etc. Inference is run on US/SG/EU cloud providers
36.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
> It's always a shock to me how opaque most other models are! This is (unfortunately) by design. The proprietary models hide their reasoning traces so they can't be used for model distillation. Sometimes even when they do sho
37.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
Oh, I wholeheartedly agree! My "bigger problem" statement can be read as "a bigger problem for the US government."
38.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
Agreed that you can export-control the closed source models pretty well (although I think the administration is gravely underestimating the long-term damage that will do to the US economy). The bigger problem will be if someone (such as a
39.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
It'll depend on what law they're restricting it under. The obvious play would be to put it on the Commerce Control List so it's covered by the EAR (Export Administration Regulations). If so, compliance is pretty well-understo
40.
by Sanzig 4mo ago
And Canada's hate speech laws are pretty reserved compared to some of their European counterparts. You pretty much have to be an actual goose-stepping Nazi or white robed Klansman to catch a charge.
41.
by Sanzig 5mo ago
I don't think that's a particularly charitable read of people's objections with Flock. If Flock was simply a network of plate readers with some additional computer vision classification features (make, model, colour, vehicle
42.
by Sanzig 5mo ago
Doubtful it will even get that far, the DoJ will simply draft an appropriate fig leaf memo with a predetermined conclusion and the government will simply plow on ahead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture_Memos
43.
by Sanzig 6mo ago
Claude is most likely a nod to Claude Shannon, father of information theory and an early AI pioneer.
44.
by Sanzig 6mo ago
Canada is capped at $5k for noncommercial infringement, and even at that amount it still isn't worth it for the copyright holder to go to court.
45.
by Sanzig 6mo ago
It's particularly aggravating with AWS, since they charge for IPv4 addresses yet many of their services aren't IPv6 capable.
46.
by Sanzig 6mo ago
Canadian ISPs are also extremely far behind on IPv6. Bell is the largest ISPs in the country and they still don't have IPv6. I'm with one of their wholly owned subsidiaries (EBOX) which offers static /56 allocations, but good
47.
by Sanzig 6mo ago
Why don't you want every device to have a public IP? There seems to be a perception that this is somehow insecure, but the default configuration of any router is to firewall everything. And one small bonus of the huge size of a /6
48.
by Sanzig 7mo ago
> Bandwidth and processing are substantial bottlenecks with SAR; Only targeted and stationary applications have been broadly useful so far, and more focus has been put on planes than satellites for this. I'm not sure why you assume
49.
by Sanzig 7mo ago
SAR operates in side-looking slant geometry. Consider shooting a ray at the ocean at an oblique angle from a satellite: it bounces off and scatters away from you. Hardly any of the energy scatters back towards you. Now, put a ship there. Th
50.
by Sanzig 7mo ago
Eh, not really. Synthetic Aperture Radar satellites used for marine ship detection have extremely wide sensor swath widths, and ships show up as very bright radar targets against the ocean. Detecting a large ship, even in a very large searc
51.
by Sanzig 7mo ago
Input: the Gettysburg Address. Output: 87 years ago, our founders launched a disruptive startup on this continent—a new nation built on the core values of liberty and the mission-driven proposition that "all men are created equal.&quot
52.
by Sanzig 7mo ago
They do, aggressively.
53.
by Sanzig 8mo ago
Bunny.net? Doesn't have near the same feature set as Cloudflare, but the essentials are there and you can easily pay as you go with a credit card.
54.
by Sanzig 8mo ago
Many countries have solved this with a special background check. In Canada we call this a "vulnerable sector check," [1] and it's usually required for roles such as childcare, education, healthcare, etc. Unlike standard backg
55.
by Sanzig 8mo ago
Hardware should be much easier, especially if you get your boards fabbed and assembled at a CM (which you probably should, very few companies have a good reason to move assembly in-house).
56.
by Sanzig 8mo ago
All Canadian jurisdictions, as far as I am aware, are at-will employment. Unionized environments are an exception because they have layoff procedures in their collective agreements, but that's the same in the US.
57.
by Sanzig 8mo ago
Seems like a very bizarre move, considering Canadian-domiciled corporations have access to very generous financial incentives (SR&ED) at both federal and provincial levels. Can't help but think this is a move meant to satisfy the U
58.
by Sanzig 10mo ago
Spacecraft state vectors.
59.
by Sanzig 10mo ago
Well, sure, they won't be thermally random, but they will be significantly perturbed from their nominal orbits, particularly at the lower orbital altitudes. Solar flares cause atmospheric upwelling, so drag dramatically increases dur
60.
by Sanzig 10mo ago
The cross section isn't actually all that outrageous, it corresponds to a hardbody radius of 4.5 meters. Hardbody radius is equal to the sum of the radii of the two colliding bodies, so 2.25 meters - which seems about right for Starlin

More ›