SanderNL

38 ms·

421.
by SanderNL 4y ago
The thing to remember about recent AI developments is that they speed up development itself . Copilot is already useful. It does not write its own code, but that’s not the bar. The bar to clear is, can this speed up itself and I think the
422.
by SanderNL 4y ago
This is all oversold hype meant to distract you from the real problems. As you say, once the novelty wears off we will return to our cubicles (if lucky) none the wiser.
423.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Yes, but it takes a while and depends on if the "ants" are in the "chimps"'s way.
424.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I sort of disagree that code is the biggest asset. Take the Yandex leak. What can you do with it? Outcompete them?
425.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I understand and thank you for the clarification. My point was that societal productivity progress is ultimately not driven by factors such as “better lives” (satisfying primary needs). It is IMO not going matter if increasing productivity
426.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I couldn't quite tell if you found a beautiful way to insult me, but it is fascinating indeed. I am hand wavey and I understand its failure modes quite well, unfortunately. It's cool to talk about it at this level of abstraction
427.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Now you got me on the edge of my seat. What is this personality type?
428.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Fair enough, but don’t we abstract “upwards” all the time? Assembly won’t go away, but do you deal with it?
429.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Except you now have a way “upwards” from an abstraction POV. Regular code is severely limited and highly surgical, by design. This is not. All these abstraction layers were invented to serve old style manual coders. Why bother explaining in
430.
by SanderNL 4y ago
We don’t become more productive because we are striving towards it like some shared goal, we do it because if we don’t, we lose (our jobs, among other things). There is no element of choice. There is no stopping this.
431.
by SanderNL 4y ago
That is a problem how?
432.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Those stochastic parrots are done for, finally! I have been telling people AI is a lie and it’s all a scam and now you can see for yourself. Buy nice warm jackets guys, winter is coming.
433.
by SanderNL 4y ago
If I use it I also make sure it’s something completely non-core business, like an arcane piece of sorting or ugly rxjs construction. I get the IP angst, but some companies think their GetGenericObjectFromDB() REST bs is secret sauce.
434.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Talk dirty to me!
435.
by SanderNL 4y ago
It feels like some type of Heisenbergian deal. You can solve what you want, but you cannot know how at the same time.
436.
by SanderNL 4y ago
AI-Enhanced Batch Processing (AIEBP) IntelliBatch: Intelligent Batch Processing AutomaBatch: Automated Batch Processing with AI I’m getting some real good vibes here. We’re getting close. I’m sure actual enterprise actors can come up with s
437.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I know.. but at the end of every (website) article?
438.
by SanderNL 4y ago
You will regret getting rid of it. It is a small form factor that is easily stored. If anything you will look back later and marvel at all the freedom we had. “You could just plug into the internet with this?”, “You say you could just downl
439.
by SanderNL 4y ago
SanderNL doesn’t know if he is just jealous, but he thinks it kind of odd to talk about one’s self on one’s own website like this: “A contributor to the fields of human intelligence and peak performance, he has held positions as chairman fo
440.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Very interesting, thanks.
441.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I’d be surprised if that doesn’t do something qualitatively with the model. Very cool, curious to see what’s possible. Thanks.
442.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I know it’s not average person money, but the average person is not looking for hardware to run inference on LLMs. A100 seem in the €15k ballpark and H100 double that. Lot of money but I am actually surprised. A dedicated regular guy could
443.
by SanderNL 4y ago
The dismissive (and ignorant) part of this is that throwing GPU’s is all they are doing.
444.
by SanderNL 4y ago
It doesn’t? Given all data of surroundings, isn’t “driving” completing the next “token” (action)?
445.
by SanderNL 4y ago
All this science nonsense just got us all this mechanical horses that were unnecessary anyway and bigger explosions, who needs all that shit anyway. We keep believing this all leads to something, I’d say drop it all and go back to the woods
446.
by SanderNL 4y ago
What, the internet had negligible impact on the productivity or the economy? Are you only talking about consumer products like YouTube or are you including everything related to the unparalleled exchange of data globally? I cannot imagine t
447.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I’m waiting for GPT4’s image API. From what I understand it’s not just a “image2text” descriptor that then “reasons” on this description, right? It’s just grokking an image directly. Were the pixels tokenized somehow? I’m very curious what
448.
by SanderNL 4y ago
We just don’t know. We can’t even agree on if there is any significant high-level behavior. “It’s alive!” and “stochastic parrot” are still both quite popular in my experience.
449.
by SanderNL 4y ago
I'm getting more convinced people should be warned. You ask it to provide you with arguments and it will, truth be damned. It's like the perfect conspiracy nutcase right next to you at all times. I'm all for freedom, but now
450.
by SanderNL 4y ago
Meta?

More ›