Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Sakos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
241.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
And Intel is somehow better? They're all terrible, including Nvidia, and it always takes a ridiculous amount of research to figure out what's what.
242.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I often pay for Patreon to get uncensored videos. Youtube by itself already devalues videos in various ways and avenues like Patreon let creators provide what they actually want to provide, not just what YouTube allows them to.
243.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
It's 2024, if you want a viable business that caters to mobile users, you need an app. There are users who don't care or even prefer the web version, but we're a minority.
244.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
Is it just me or does that section not really explain why? The reasons given here felt more insightful to me: https://box2d.org/documentation/md_faq.html > Box2D is designed to be portable and easy to wrap with othe
245.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
Why is MSFT so interested in funding this?
246.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
It matters how vocal and widespread that toxic portion is. In Rust's case, it's significantly larger and more visible and more toxic than I've seen in, say, the Python or C camps. > so following that logic all wells would
247.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I don't understand why DEFCON deserves the benefit of the doubt, but Entropic and dmitry don't. Here's Entropic's response: > We were clear as early as our first conversation in January that the risk in trying to push
248.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
It doesn't matter if only a portion is toxic, because that portion can easily poison the well all on their own for everybody.
249.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I still have an i5 2500k chugging along being able to do everything that isn't a heavy workload with ease. This kind of exploit for a CPU that is only 5 years old not getting a fix is embarrassing and shameful.
250.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
Jesus, that's catastrophic. They weren't kidding. "No fix planned" isn't acceptable.
251.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I want to know if Firefox or Chrome would pass these requirements as is. If not, they're clearly taking the piss and the EU should take a gigantic dump on them.
252.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
There are some that don't (such as many of the gaming benchmarks), but they also have Factorio in the CPU category where it, of course, blows the 9700x out of the water. I don't think anybody was expecting anything but the 9x00x3D
253.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I'm confused. I see 7800x3D in a bunch of the benchmarks in the article: https://www.anandtech.com/show/21493/the-amd-ryzen-7-9700x-a...
254.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
> You cannot blame apple for acting in its own best interests. That’s the nature of the capitalism beast. I care about end-users. I care about my interests. I don't care about Apple's interests, because they are only "inci
255.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
You might not see the issue there. You might be willing to forgive Apple for it. Plenty of us aren't. And it has nothing to do with "hating Apple", rather it's an extension of hating how Apple makes decisions regarding t
256.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
It doesn't matter whether it was incidental or not. If a company accidentally dumps toxic sludge into a river, people aren't just going to shrug and say "oh, it was an accident". If Asus releases a Windows laptop with ha
257.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
Yeah, wish I could still assign it to different hardware keys instead of it being relegated to an implementation detail that differs depending on what application I happen to be using or even which field I have highlighted in a particular a
258.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I think there is a clearly anti-competitive component in this, demonstrated by the recent AI training deal between Reddit and Google. The one that went hand in hand with preventing any search engine but Google from indexing Reddit: https:&
259.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
That's okay, I'm glad we could clear it up. I won't pretend that I have any idea how one would best learn a language and I don't know if Duolingo is effective at all. I just understand why people want services like it.
260.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
It feels to me like we're in agreement, so I'm not certain why you're saying my original sentence is nonsense. > people would still not picked book as replacement Yes, exactly. > And book as your only resource have mass
261.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I'm not questioning the Twitter post. I just need more details in order to get an accurate picture of what's actually happening. The tweet is too vague for me to really understand, regardless of how trusted the person is.
262.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
The whole purpose of Duolingo is emotional and psychological manipulation to get us to override our tendencies to procrastinate, forget, etc. Otherwise we'd just pick up a foreign language book. I don't really get the framing of t
263.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
Really need more details on what happened. Are they replacing whatever spam filter they had with Apple Intelligence? Is the usual spam filter disabled? Is there usually a spam filter at all? What client is this, Mail?
264.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I have no idea how you misinterpreted my comment so badly.
265.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
There are two conditions for AI working at all. 1) Access to all the internet's data without restriction, including all books and research papers. 2) The model isn't controlled and owned by a for-profit company, it has to be an in
266.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
> We do not want to share space with a UV-C air sterilizer because we like to see with our eyeballs This was a good read.
267.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
> perverse incentives from a very small subset of users This is to the benefit of everybody now and in the future. It doesn't matter if only an insignificant fraction of people recognize the importance.
268.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
There is a historical and cultural loss involved when online only games are shutdown. This isn't simply a problem of "oh there was never an expectation of eternal access". It's a problem of us losing historical artifacts
269.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
I got the snobbish vibe from being in these communities and wasting my time on them. It's just another form of gatekeeping.
270.
▲
by
Sakos
2y ago
The fact that the TRO was issued seems insane to me. So now DigiCert can't revoke the certificates because these jokers can't handle rotating certificates and they're making it everybody else's problem.
More ›