Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SahAssar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
961.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Is there something substantially new here or is this just a beta branch of the regular proton?
962.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
So you don't have an answer to why you think it's trivial to implement E2EE?
963.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Why do you think it's trivial to implement E2EE? It's extremely complicated to do it in a way that works well, and handling things like backup/restore of messages, how to handle key recovery in case of lost devices/login
964.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
If you give your messages to a service provider of course they can read it. Same as if you give your messages to twitter, facebook, your telecom operator or anyone else. Either make sure that the party is trustworthy or make sure the servi
965.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Only if the parody is parodizing the original artwork.
966.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
I have seen a lot of SEO content spam, and this article does not come across as that to me.
967.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> blatant SEO attempt It is marketing and trying to influence the discourse, but I don't see how you can call it SEO.
968.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Right, so that is an argument against outsourcing low-traffic stuff to a serverless runtime, right?
969.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
That sounds like a clear no, you already know the answer to the hypothesized A/B test. As for the other aspects they sound like great targets for testing within different use-cases, but I'm not sure why that'd be an A/B
970.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> A/B testing isn't a new thing - I'm sure the inventor of the wheel experimented with different shapes, and the buyer of the hexagonal wheel probably didn't have the best user experience. Consider yourself that inven
971.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
What do you mean?
972.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
If the load is so minimal for those functions and you are already running other infra for the rest of your app why would you "outsource" those functions to a serverless runtime? What do you gain besides another system you deploy t
973.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
If I'm understanding this correctly this is a server hosting a bunch of fediverse instances. From the title I thought it would either be articles about good open source projects or maybe a collective developing open source projects. Ba
974.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
XML is a far more complex format to parse.
975.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Yes, it applies to the whole process. It's incredibly hard to sandbox dependencies individually since you don't know how your code or other dependencies interact with it. If you want you can run dependencies in a worker process an
976.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> Yeah, there were ads in Newspapers and Magazines too that you paid money. The publishers of those paid for the content, paid for editing, paid for the physical medium, paid for physical distribution. Twitter is distributing short piece
977.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> creator now working for the competition Microsoft hasn't been the competition for while. They might not be "part of the team", but they definitely have more to win by linux being alive than dead. I'd put them more a
978.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
The "scandal" was the exact opposite of your complaint. People where SSHing in, starting a screen/tmux, disconnecting and complaining about the process being killed.
979.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
No, that way is safe. Just make sure that your workers also check for items in the queue when they start.
980.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
That started with BF3, and worked pretty OK there.
981.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Are you (MBCook) and sylens the same person? You are replying as if you are.
982.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Literally nobody claims that googled code can be used without agreement from the author.
983.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
That does not really help here, right?
984.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
By "the continent" I assume you are speaking about the rest of europe, and in that case I don't think you can say anything coherent about their systems.
985.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> Or they could integrate a way to find the produced output back in the corpus if it's sufficiently close and provide a reference/attribution. Basically whatever tool a copyright lawyer would use to track down original work. Th
986.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> because is almost impossible to fix, harden or make secure. I'd like some more context on this. Especially since it is used in many security-critical contexts currently.
987.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
Using an acronym no-one else in the thread is using, is not in common usage (this comment is 5:th for a google search for "WAN WebAuthN" and the other results do not use the acronym) and without defining it at the first usage is a
988.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> It's a mess, only comparable to openssl, sqlite and bash. Why do you consider sqlite abandoned or a mess?
989.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
> The book is now closed on multimedia: ffmpeg is the solution to almost all of your problems. Isn't gstreamer very much used within this area too?
990.
▲
by
SahAssar
4y ago
60 or 90 days is pretty standard for non-bounty disclosure, and has been used by high profile projects like project zero.
More ›