Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SahAssar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
751.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
> you can certainly see the sentiment frequently expressed on HN that the rise of NoSQL and of ORM's is a direct result of otherwise capable programmers not wanting to deal with SQL and its conceptual building blocks such as joins I
752.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Any of those reasons should then have been documented in public, which the poster said it was not.
753.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
This whole subthread is about podcasts, and in that space apple was pretty early (2005 in itunes, 2012 as a standalone app) and spotify was very late.
754.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
A core part of npm is that the dependencies are installed in the folder/project you are working in (unless you use the --global flag which is discouraged for most use-cases). Can I use this in any way without a global system state? Lik
755.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
None of what you mentioned protects against XSS which the parent mentioned. Things like having a proper CSP might but only if the application is built so it does not depend on insecure eval/inline and/or you can properly disallow
756.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Or add a default randomness factor that makes it run within a certain time (like 60s or 5m) of the target, perhaps with an additional charge to run at the exact time if people have that requirement.
757.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Azure runs on a modified HyperV, right? Or are you saying they are using some other hypervisor there?
758.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Teams was built in-house, right? Whose existing customers did they fuck over?
759.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Node has a built in watch mode and so does tsc. So if you start both you should get what you want.
760.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
I'm not saying to delay the report. I'm saying to not headline the size of the leak unless it has some sort of significance. If the severity is later known report that as news. If anything this would create two stories where there
761.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Journalists are almost never deep experts of the fields they report on (although I hope well versed), but given the tools to report the news in a way that is more understandable to the public I think they will use them. Both journalists and
762.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Agreed, but journalists need a better way to communicate. Saying 45GB sounds like a lot of emails to a technical person and nothing to someone who bought a bargain-bin 64GB USB memory stick the other day and filled it with a single HD movie
763.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Sure, but instead of saying "Boeing leaked 45GB" it would say "Boeing leaked files of undetermined severity". The disk size does not matter, and when the severity was actually determined it would show up in the headlines
764.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Can we stop using disk size as a measure of leaked data? There are bluray movies larger than this leak and there are files smaller than 10kb a lot more critical in most businesses. It'd be nice if there was some sort of scale for data
765.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
But MS has said they are willing to hire Sam/Greg and the employees have stated that they are willing to follow Sam/Greg. If you think that Satya will go back on his offer argue that, but otherwise it seems like the players are Sa
766.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
I see it the other way, Satya has clearly stated that he'd hire Sam and the rest of OpenAI anytime, but as soon as Sam is officially hired it might be seen as a door closing on any chance to revive OpenAI. Satya saying "Securing t
767.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Why a yes for Kenneth Lay? Do you think the experience of running a scam is transferable to a real business? Or do you not consider enron a scam? Or do you think the line between scams and businesses is so blurred that the skill doing them
768.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Adam Neumann is not a good example. While he has proven good at raising money he has not been proven at running a business or even finding successful ones. My comment was exactly about that difference.
769.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Would you say the same thing for Enron execs? For Bernie Madoff? I think the business of running a scam or a fraudulent company is quite different to an actual business.
770.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Minority owner, but largest owner, right? I think the point stands and I would assume the board consulted with MS before posting the news.
771.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
> small nuclear reactors (SMRs) To be clear, that acronym is for "Small Modular Reactors". Just in case anyone else was confused or thought it was a NATO/OTAN thing.
772.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
They will still require a phone number, it's just a alias.
773.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Eclipses are extremely predictable, right? I don't think the problem is that the LLM has old data, the problem is that is wrong.
774.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
> Look at any major CVE and you will almost always see "...that attackers can exploit remotely". > It is logical - 9x% of large cyber-attacks are done digitally, not with physical proximity to the target. A remote vulnerabil
775.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
And then you are just writing css with a more obtuse syntax.
776.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Why would they care? They are not hosted on Vercel.
777.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
Domains and hosting are usually seen very differently. Your domain is a lot closer to property, while the hosting is commonly shut down anytime it is seen as inconvenient by the provider. If you combine them on the same provider you risk lo
778.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
My takeaway is that the EU as a whole is somewhat responsive to public feedback but it is still too far removed from the people and our will.
779.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
How would you define it? The wiki article for it in the context of software ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software ) seems to pretty much stand it in opposition to open licenses, but I also have a sort of g
780.
▲
by
SahAssar
3y ago
"npm" is a environment/scoped package manager. Saying "npm -g" when -g is a flag tell it to run in a non-default way (globally) is a bad argument.
More ›