Sacho

75 ms·

1. 661.▲
   by Sacho 11y ago

   I think the parent was correct. In your explanation you even state "an interpreter which typically...". You talk about compilers and interpreters, which aren't part of the language. The way you describe it, compiled or interp
2. 662.▲
   by Sacho 11y ago

   If the case would just "stop", they wouldn't go to jail - all Judge Wright imposed were monetary sanctions(he only threatened incarceration). Furthermore, the monetary sanctions aren't even that big(compared to the claim
3. 663.▲
   by Sacho 11y ago

   I found the video source fascinating - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObZDipKRH0c Specifically, the judges' exasperation at Voelker's request (at first) that they remand the case for criminal proceedings. Also Ju
4. 664.▲
   by Sacho 12y ago

   Sorry - I have no idea how I missed your post(the non-chronological order of HN is a bit confusing to me) - but your first post certainly did make a statement without providing any evidence.
5. 665.▲
   by Sacho 12y ago

   I don't know why you're getting downvoted without anyone challenging your argument. I completely agree that the parent comment about being "unverified by science" is bogus(is it? where? citations, links?). However, I wou
6. 666.▲
   by Sacho 13y ago

   He claimed that most societies(and at least the Western ones I've had contact with match that pretty well) shun exposing sexual organs to children. I don't see why the rage. This is not a controversial comment to make.